StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Handlebars.js vs Vue.js

Handlebars.js vs Vue.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308
Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K

Handlebars.js vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between Handlebars.js and Vue.js. Both are popular JavaScript libraries used for building user interfaces, but they have distinct features and characteristics that set them apart from each other.

  1. Template Syntax: Handlebars.js uses a {{mustache}} syntax for templating, where variables are enclosed within double curly braces. It allows simple expressions and partials, making the templates more readable. On the other hand, Vue.js uses an HTML-like syntax, combining HTML templates with JavaScript. This approach enables the usage of directives, filters, and computed properties, providing more flexibility in the templates.

  2. Reactivity: Vue.js offers reactive and declarative rendering, where the user interface automatically updates when the underlying data changes. It achieves this by leveraging a virtual DOM and a reactivity system that tracks dependencies and updates only the necessary components. In contrast, Handlebars.js does not have built-in reactivity, and developers have to manually update the templates when the data changes.

  3. Component-Based Architecture: Vue.js has a component-based architecture, allowing developers to create modular and reusable components. Components encapsulate their own templates, styles, and logic, making them easier to manage and maintain. However, Handlebars.js does not have native support for components, and developers have to rely on helper functions or custom approaches to achieve modularity.

  4. Size and Performance: Handlebars.js is a lightweight library with a small footprint, making it suitable for projects where size is a concern. It focuses solely on templating and does not provide additional features like reactivity or component system, which can result in better performance in some scenarios. Vue.js, on the other hand, offers a complete framework with a larger size, but it provides enhanced features out of the box, making it more suitable for complex applications.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: Vue.js has gained significant popularity over the years due to its ease of use, documentation, and a strong community, resulting in a robust and extensive ecosystem. It has a wide range of plugins, tools, and community-created components available, making development faster and more efficient. While Handlebars.js also has a decent community support, it may not offer the same level of resources and ecosystem as Vue.js.

  6. Learning Curve and Integration: Handlebars.js has a simple and intuitive syntax, which makes it easier to learn and integrate into existing projects. It has a gentle learning curve, especially for developers familiar with HTML and JavaScript. On the other hand, Vue.js may have a slightly steeper learning curve, especially for beginners, due to its additional features and concepts. However, once mastered, Vue.js offers more advanced capabilities and a seamless integration with other JavaScript libraries or existing projects.

In Summary, Handlebars.js and Vue.js differ in their template syntax, reactivity, component-based architecture, size and performance, ecosystem and community support, as well as the learning curve and integration capabilities. Choosing between the two depends on the specific requirements, complexity of the project, and familiarity with the libraries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, Vue.js

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Vue.js
Vue.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

-
Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
33.8K
Stacks
8.3K
Stacks
55.5K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
44.7K
Votes
308
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
Integrations
Mustache
Mustache
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, Vue.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase