StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Handsontable vs jQuery UI

Handsontable vs jQuery UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Stacks40.6K
Followers13.3K
Votes899
GitHub Stars11.3K
Forks5.3K
Handsontable
Handsontable
Stacks58
Followers77
Votes6
GitHub Stars21.6K
Forks3.2K

Handsontable vs jQuery UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

When deciding between Handsontable and jQuery UI for implementing interactive tables and user interface components on a website, understanding the key differences can help in making an informed choice.

  1. Customization Options: Handsontable provides extensive customization options for designing complex data tables with features like filtering, sorting, and advanced formatting. On the other hand, jQuery UI is more focused on providing a range of user interface components such as buttons, sliders, and accordions for enhancing the overall user experience.

  2. Ease of Implementation: Handsontable is specifically designed for creating data grids and tables, offering ready-to-use functionalities for managing and displaying large datasets efficiently. In contrast, jQuery UI is a general-purpose library that requires additional plugins or custom code for implementing data tables with similar functionality.

  3. Documentation and Support: Handsontable has detailed documentation, with a focus on data-related features and configurations, making it easier for developers to understand and implement complex data tables. jQuery UI, while well-documented, may require more effort to find specific resources related to integrating data tables within its framework.

  4. Community and Updates: Both Handsontable and jQuery UI have active communities, but Handsontable tends to focus more on data-related issues and updates, ensuring that new features and enhancements are aligned with the evolving needs of data-driven applications. jQuery UI, being a broader UI library, may have updates that cover a wider range of user interface components rather than specific data table functionalities.

  5. Performance and Scalability: Handsontable is optimized for handling large datasets and complex interactions within data tables, offering better performance in scenarios where there is a need for real-time updates and data manipulation. jQuery UI, while efficient for general user interface interactions, may not provide the same level of performance when dealing with extensive data processing tasks within tables.

  6. Integration with External Libraries: Handsontable has built-in support for integrating with popular data manipulation libraries like Handsontable-pro, enabling seamless integration of advanced features for data analysis and visualization. In contrast, jQuery UI may require additional libraries or custom plugins for achieving similar capabilities, leading to a more fragmented development process.

In Summary, the choice between Handsontable and jQuery UI depends on the specific requirements of the project, with Handsontable offering robust data table functionalities and customization options, while jQuery UI excels in providing a wide range of user interface components for enhancing the overall user experience on a website.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Handsontable
Handsontable

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Handsontable is a minimalist approach to Excel-like table editor (datagrid/data grid) in HTML & JavaScript.

-
Cell renderers;Custom HTML;Scroll bars & Column stretch;└ Scroll window;Conditional formatting;Pre-populate new rows;Highlight current row/col;Column sorting;Column & row resize;Column & row move;Fixed rows/columns;Pagination;Merge cells;Horizontal & vertical align;Custom borders;Column & row grouping
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.3K
GitHub Stars
21.6K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
3.2K
Stacks
40.6K
Stacks
58
Followers
13.3K
Followers
77
Votes
899
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 215
    Ui components
  • 156
    Cross-browser
  • 121
    Easy
  • 100
    It's jquery
  • 81
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Does not contain charts or graphs
Pros
  • 5
    Excel in browser
  • 1
    Open Source Edition

What are some alternatives to jQuery UI, Handsontable?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase