StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Haskell vs Rust vs Scala

Haskell vs Rust vs Scala

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Scala
Scala
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
GitHub Stars14.4K
Forks3.1K
Haskell
Haskell
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.2K
Votes527
Rust
Rust
Stacks6.1K
Followers5.0K
Votes1.2K
GitHub Stars107.6K
Forks13.9K

Haskell vs Rust vs Scala: What are the differences?

  1. Type System: Haskell is a purely functional programming language with a strong, static type system that enforces immutability by default, whereas Rust is a systems programming language with a focus on safety and performance, featuring a unique ownership system to prevent data races and memory errors. Scala, on the other hand, is a hybrid functional and object-oriented language that offers type inference and higher-kinded types for flexible programming paradigms.
  2. Concurrency Model: Haskell uses lightweight threads and software transactional memory for concurrency, allowing for efficient and safe parallelism in functional programming. Rust employs the actor model of concurrency with its "fearless concurrency" features, ensuring thread safety and preventing data races using ownership and borrowing rules. Scala provides a mix of actor-based and thread-based concurrency models through libraries like Akka, offering scalable and fault-tolerant solutions for distributed systems.
  3. Performance: Haskell is known for its high-level of abstraction and expressive power but may suffer from performance overhead due to lazy evaluation and garbage collection, although optimizations can be applied. Rust excels in performance-critical applications with zero-cost abstractions and control over memory management, allowing for competitive speed comparable to C or C++. Scala, being a JVM-based language, may face performance bottlenecks due to garbage collection pauses but can benefit from Java interoperability and optimization tools.
  4. Error Handling: In Haskell, errors are typically managed through monads like Maybe or Either for safe and composable handling of exceptional cases, promoting functional programming principles. Rust emphasizes on zero-cost abstractions for error handling through Result types and the usage of the "panic-free" philosophy with the Result and Option enums. Scala supports a mix of functional and object-oriented error handling techniques, such as Try and Either monads along with standard try-catch blocks for exception handling.
  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: Haskell has a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools for functional programming, but its tooling support may vary across different IDEs and build systems, requiring additional setup for efficient development. Rust's tooling is well-supported by the official toolchain, Cargo package manager, and IDE integrations, providing a seamless experience for building, testing, and deploying applications. Scala benefits from the wider Java ecosystem, including build tools like sbt and integration with popular IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA, enabling smooth development for both Java and Scala projects.
  6. Community and Adoption: Haskell has a dedicated community of functional programming enthusiasts and researchers, with a focus on language purity and elegant solutions, but its adoption in industry may be limited due to a steeper learning curve and perceived complexity. Rust has gained popularity for systems programming and safety-critical applications, attracting a growing community of developers interested in performance and memory safety, leading to broader industry adoption. Scala, being a versatile language for various domains like web development and data analytics, has a strong community support from both functional and object-oriented programmers, driving its adoption in diverse industries.

In Summary, Haskell, Rust, and Scala differ in their type systems, concurrency models, performance characteristics, error handling approaches, tooling ecosystems, and community adoption.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Scala, Haskell, Rust

Nicholas
Nicholas

Jan 29, 2021

Decided

I am working in the domain of big data and machine learning. I am helping companies with bringing their machine learning models to the production. In many projects there is a tendency to port Python, PySpark code to Scala and Scala Spark.

This yields to longer time to market and a lot of mistakes due to necessity to understand and re-write the code. Also many libraries/apis that data scientists/machine learning practitioners use are not available in jvm ecosystem.

Simply, refactoring (if necessary) and organising the code of the data scientists by following best practices of software development is less error prone and faster comparing to re-write in Scala.

Pipeline orchestration tools such as Luigi/Airflow is python native and fits well to this picture.

I have heard some arguments against Python such as, it is slow, or it is hard to maintain due to its dynamically typed language. However cost/benefit of time consumed porting python code to java/scala alone would be enough as a counter-argument. ML pipelines rarerly contains a lot of code (if that is not the case, such as complex domain and significant amount of code, then scala would be a better fit).

In terms of performance, I did not see any issues with Python. It is not the fastest runtime around but ML applications are rarely time-critical (majority of them is batch based).

I still prefer Scala for developing APIs and for applications where the domain contains complex logic.

198k views198k
Comments
Johan
Johan

Jan 28, 2021

Decided

Context: Writing an open source CLI tool.

Go and Rust over Python: Simple distribution.

With Go and Rust, just build statically compiled binaries and hand them out.

With Python, have people install with "pip install --user" and not finding the binaries :(.

Go and Rust over Python: Startup and runtime performance

Go and Rust over Python: No need to worry about which Python interpreter version is installed on the users' machines.

Go over Rust: Simplicity; Rust's memory management comes at a development / maintenance cost.

Go over Rust: Easier cross compiles from macOS to Linux.

397k views397k
Comments
Omar
Omar

Feb 23, 2021

Needs adviceonRubyRubyJavaScriptJavaScriptRustRust

I was thinking about adding a new technology to my current stack (Ruby and JavaScript). But, I want a compiled language, mainly for speed and scalability reasons compared to interpreted languages. I have tried each one (Rust, Java, and Kotlin). I loved them, and I don't know which one can offer me more opportunities for the future (I'm in my first year of software engineering at university).

Which language should I choose?

443k views443k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Scala
Scala
Haskell
Haskell
Rust
Rust

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

It is a general purpose language that can be used in any domain and use case, it is ideally suited for proprietary business logic and data analysis, fast prototyping and enhancing existing software environments with correct code, performance and scalability.

Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.

-
Statically typed; Purely functional; Type inference; Concurrent
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
107.6K
GitHub Forks
3.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
13.9K
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
6.1K
Followers
7.8K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
5.0K
Votes
1.5K
Votes
527
Votes
1.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 188
    Static typing
  • 178
    Pattern-matching
  • 175
    Jvm
  • 172
    Scala is fun
  • 138
    Types
Cons
  • 11
    Slow compilation time
  • 7
    Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
  • 6
    Too few developers available
  • 4
    Complicated subtyping
  • 2
    My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff
Pros
  • 90
    Purely-functional programming
  • 66
    Statically typed
  • 59
    Type-safe
  • 39
    Open source
  • 38
    Great community
Cons
  • 9
    Too much distraction in language extensions
  • 8
    Error messages can be very confusing
  • 5
    Libraries have poor documentation
  • 3
    No good ABI
  • 3
    No best practices
Pros
  • 146
    Guaranteed memory safety
  • 133
    Fast
  • 89
    Open source
  • 75
    Minimal runtime
  • 73
    Pattern matching
Cons
  • 28
    Hard to learn
  • 24
    Ownership learning curve
  • 12
    Unfriendly, verbose syntax
  • 4
    No jobs
  • 4
    Variable shadowing
Integrations
Java
Java
No integrations availableNo integrations available

What are some alternatives to Scala, Haskell, Rust?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase