StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Hazelcast vs PostgreSQL

Hazelcast vs PostgreSQL

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Stacks103.1K
Followers83.9K
Votes3.6K
GitHub Stars19.0K
Forks5.2K
Hazelcast
Hazelcast
Stacks427
Followers474
Votes59
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks1.9K

Hazelcast vs PostgreSQL: What are the differences?

Key differences between Hazelcast and PostgreSQL

Introduction:

Hazelcast and PostgreSQL are two popular technologies used for data storage and retrieval. While both provide functionalities for managing and processing data, there are several key differences between Hazelcast and PostgreSQL.

  1. Data Model:

Hazelcast is an in-memory data grid that offers distributed, fault-tolerant storage for data. It uses a key-value model, where data is stored and accessed using a unique key. On the other hand, PostgreSQL is a traditional relational database management system (RDBMS) that uses a table-based data model, with rows and columns.

  1. Scalability:

Hazelcast is designed to scale horizontally, allowing for the addition of more nodes to the cluster as the data and workload grow. It provides automatic data sharding and replication, distributing the data across multiple nodes for improved performance and fault tolerance. PostgreSQL, on the other hand, can also scale horizontally but requires more manual configuration and management.

  1. Data Persistence:

Hazelcast is primarily an in-memory data grid, which means that the data is stored in the memory of the nodes. It provides options for persisting the data to disk, but these are typically used for backup or recovery purposes. On the other hand, PostgreSQL is a disk-based database system, where data is persistently stored on disk and can be accessed even after a system restart.

  1. Data Consistency:

Hazelcast provides eventual consistency, meaning that updates to the data are propagated asynchronously across the cluster, and there might be a temporary period where different nodes have different versions of the data. PostgreSQL, on the other hand, provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that all updates and queries see a consistent view of the data.

  1. Query Language:

Hazelcast provides a programmatic interface for querying data using its own query language called Predicate. It allows users to filter and transform data using custom logic. PostgreSQL, on the other hand, uses SQL (Structured Query Language), a standardized language for managing and querying relational databases. SQL offers a wide range of powerful features for querying and manipulating data.

  1. Data Types and Advanced Features:

PostgreSQL offers a rich set of data types and advanced features, such as support for JSON, GIS (Geographic Information System) data, and full-text search. It also provides transaction management, data integrity constraints, and advanced indexing options. Hazelcast, on the other hand, focuses more on providing fast, scalable data storage and retrieval, and does not offer the same level of advanced features and data types as PostgreSQL.

In summary, Hazelcast is an in-memory data grid that provides distributed storage and processing capabilities, while PostgreSQL is a disk-based relational database management system. They differ in terms of data model, scalability, persistence, consistency, query language, and advanced features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PostgreSQL, Hazelcast

Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Redacted DevWorks

Dec 3, 2019

DecidedonPostGISPostGIS

While there's been some very clever techniques that has allowed non-natively supported geo querying to be performed, it is incredibly slow in the long game and error prone at best.

MySQL finally introduced it's own GEO functions and special indexing operations for GIS type data. I prototyped with this, as MySQL is the most familiar database to me. But no matter what I did with it, how much tuning i'd give it, how much I played with it, the results would come back inconsistent.

It was very disappointing.

I figured, at this point, that SQL Server, being an enterprise solution authored by one of the biggest worldwide software developers in the world, Microsoft, might contain some decent GIS in it.

I was very disappointed.

Postgres is a Database solution i'm still getting familiar with, but I noticed it had no built in support for GIS. So I hilariously didn't pay it too much attention. That was until I stumbled upon PostGIS and my world changed forever.

449k views449k
Comments
George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Navraj
Navraj

CEO at SuPragma

Apr 16, 2020

Needs adviceonMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I asked my last question incorrectly. Rephrasing it here.

I am looking for the most secure open source database for my project I'm starting: https://github.com/SuPragma/SuPragma/wiki

Which database is more secure? MySQL or PostgreSQL? Are there others I should be considering? Is it possible to change the encryption keys dynamically?

Thanks,

Raj

401k views401k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Hazelcast
Hazelcast

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

-
Distributed implementations of java.util.{Queue, Set, List, Map};Distributed implementation of java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;Distributed implementation of java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;Distributed MultiMap for one-to-many relationships;Distributed Topic for publish/subscribe messaging;Synchronous (write-through) and asynchronous (write-behind) persistence;Transaction support;Socket level encryption support for secure clusters;Second level cache provider for Hibernate;Monitoring and management of the cluster via JMX;Dynamic HTTP session clustering;Support for cluster info and membership events;Dynamic discovery, scaling, partitioning with backups and fail-over
Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.0K
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Forks
5.2K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
103.1K
Stacks
427
Followers
83.9K
Followers
474
Votes
3.6K
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 765
    Relational database
  • 511
    High availability
  • 439
    Enterprise class database
  • 383
    Sql
  • 304
    Sql + nosql
Cons
  • 10
    Table/index bloatings
Pros
  • 11
    High Availibility
  • 6
    Distributed compute
  • 6
    Distributed Locking
  • 5
    Sharding
  • 4
    Load balancing
Cons
  • 4
    License needed for SSL
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Spring
Spring

What are some alternatives to PostgreSQL, Hazelcast?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase