HERE Routing vs MapTiler

Overview

MapTiler

Stacks19

Followers59

Votes5

HERE Routing

Stacks7

Followers12

Votes0

HERE Routing vs MapTiler: What are the differences?

Key Differences between HERE Routing and MapTiler

Data Sources: HERE Routing utilizes HERE Maps data, which is known for its accuracy and comprehensive coverage, while MapTiler uses OpenStreetMap data. HERE Maps data is constantly updated with real-time information, providing users with the most accurate routing details. On the other hand, MapTiler's use of OpenStreetMap data may sometimes lack the same level of precision and detail as HERE Maps.
Routing Algorithms: HERE Routing employs advanced routing algorithms that consider real-time traffic conditions, road restrictions, and other factors to provide optimal routes efficiently. In contrast, MapTiler may use simpler routing algorithms that do not take as many variables into account, potentially resulting in less precise route calculations.
Customization Options: HERE Routing offers a wide range of customization options for developers to tailor the routing experience to their specific needs, including options for different vehicle types, routing preferences, and route optimization strategies. MapTiler, on the other hand, may have more limited customization options, restricting the level of control developers have over the routing process.
Integration Capabilities: HERE Routing integrates seamlessly with other HERE location-based services, such as geocoding and mapping functionalities, allowing for a more cohesive and comprehensive location-based solution. MapTiler, while providing routing capabilities, may not offer the same level of integration with other location-based services, potentially requiring additional development to achieve similar functionality.
Real-time Updates: HERE Routing is known for its ability to provide real-time updates on traffic conditions, road closures, and other relevant information that may affect routing decisions. MapTiler may have more limited real-time update capabilities, potentially leading to less accurate and up-to-date routing information for users.

In Summary, HERE Routing and MapTiler differ in terms of data sources, routing algorithms, customization options, integration capabilities, and real-time updates.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

MapTiler	HERE Routing
It is a software for map tile rendering. It has been designed for producing seamless maps and aerial photo layers covering whole countries. The rendering is fast and efficient, and it can fully utilize multiple CPUs to 100%.	It is a web service API that offers easy and fast routing for several regions in the world. Easily solve complex challenges for moving fleets, passengers and businesses.
Satellite imagery; Drones; Precision agriculture.	Get accurate ETAs with routing algorithms that use rich map data sets and dynamically updated information.; Solve complex real-world use cases without any additional coding; Routing instructions in 108 languages for different modes of travel: car, foot, bicycle, motorcycle and public transit
Statistics
Stacks 19	Stacks 7
Followers 59	Followers 12
Votes 5	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Vector tiles 1 Affordable 1 Custom map design (colors, fonts, etc) 1 OpenStreetMap	No community feedback yet
Integrations
fancybox Nuclino Here Maps Anvil OpenStreetMap	JavaScript iOS Android OS

What are some alternatives to MapTiler, HERE Routing?

Google Maps

Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow.

Mapbox

We make it possible to pin travel spots on Pinterest, find restaurants on Foursquare, and visualize data on GitHub.

Leaflet

Leaflet is an open source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. It is developed by Vladimir Agafonkin of MapBox with a team of dedicated contributors. Weighing just about 30 KB of gzipped JS code, it has all the features most developers ever need for online maps.

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap is built by a community of mappers that contribute and maintain data about roads, trails, cafés, railway stations, and much more, all over the world.

OpenLayers

An opensource javascript library to load, display and render maps from multiple sources on web pages.

ArcGIS

It is a geographic information system for working with maps and geographic information. It is used for creating and using maps, compiling geographic data, analyzing mapped information, sharing and much more.

CSV2GEO

It provides live conversion of batch addresses into geographic coordinates (address to lat long) or turn coordinates into well formatted address. It creates and publishes interactive maps.

MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME is an open source cross-platform offline maps application, built on top of crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data. It was publicly released for iOS and Android.

LocationIQ

Free and Fast Geocoding Service

Stadia Maps

We enable devs to contextualize their data on a map and build complicated apps involving routing, time zones, and more with our APIs. We hate billing surprises as much as you, and if you send us an email, you'll get a real human reply.

Related Comparisons

HERE Routing vs MapTiler: What are the differences?

Key Differences between HERE Routing and MapTiler

Data Sources: HERE Routing utilizes HERE Maps data, which is known for its accuracy and comprehensive coverage, while MapTiler uses OpenStreetMap data. HERE Maps data is constantly updated with real-time information, providing users with the most accurate routing details. On the other hand, MapTiler's use of OpenStreetMap data may sometimes lack the same level of precision and detail as HERE Maps.
Routing Algorithms: HERE Routing employs advanced routing algorithms that consider real-time traffic conditions, road restrictions, and other factors to provide optimal routes efficiently. In contrast, MapTiler may use simpler routing algorithms that do not take as many variables into account, potentially resulting in less precise route calculations.
Customization Options: HERE Routing offers a wide range of customization options for developers to tailor the routing experience to their specific needs, including options for different vehicle types, routing preferences, and route optimization strategies. MapTiler, on the other hand, may have more limited customization options, restricting the level of control developers have over the routing process.
Integration Capabilities: HERE Routing integrates seamlessly with other HERE location-based services, such as geocoding and mapping functionalities, allowing for a more cohesive and comprehensive location-based solution. MapTiler, while providing routing capabilities, may not offer the same level of integration with other location-based services, potentially requiring additional development to achieve similar functionality.
Real-time Updates: HERE Routing is known for its ability to provide real-time updates on traffic conditions, road closures, and other relevant information that may affect routing decisions. MapTiler may have more limited real-time update capabilities, potentially leading to less accurate and up-to-date routing information for users.

In Summary, HERE Routing and MapTiler differ in terms of data sources, routing algorithms, customization options, integration capabilities, and real-time updates.

HERE Routing vs MapTiler

Overview