HERE Routing vs OpenLayers

Overview

OpenLayers

Stacks776

Followers462

Votes57

HERE Routing

Stacks7

Followers12

Votes0

HERE Routing vs OpenLayers: What are the differences?

Data sources: HERE Routing primarily uses HERE Maps data, which includes real-time traffic data, road networks, and points of interest. On the other hand, OpenLayers allows users to define their own data sources, enabling more flexibility in the choice of mapping data.
API ease of use: HERE Routing offers a set of APIs tailored specifically for routing functionalities, making it straightforward for developers to implement routing features. In contrast, OpenLayers is a more general mapping library that includes routing capabilities as part of its larger set of features, which may require more effort to set up for routing purposes.
Customization options: OpenLayers provides extensive customization options for map styling and interactivity, allowing developers to create highly customized mapping experiences. In comparison, HERE Routing focuses more on providing pre-packaged routing features with limited customization capabilities.
Geocoding capabilities: HERE Routing includes geocoding services as part of its routing platform, allowing users to convert addresses into geographic coordinates for routing purposes. OpenLayers, on the other hand, does not provide built-in geocoding capabilities and requires integration with external geocoding services for address conversion.
Offline routing: HERE Routing offers offline routing capabilities, allowing users to plan routes even without an internet connection by pre-downloading map data. OpenLayers does not natively support offline routing, requiring continuous internet access for routing functionalities.

In Summary, the key differences between HERE Routing and OpenLayers lie in their data sources, API ease of use, customization options, geocoding capabilities, and offline routing support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenLayers	HERE Routing
An opensource javascript library to load, display and render maps from multiple sources on web pages.	It is a web service API that offers easy and fast routing for several regions in the world. Easily solve complex challenges for moving fleets, passengers and businesses.
Tiled Layers - Pull tiles from OSM, Bing, MapBox, Stamen, MapQuest, and any other XYZ source you can find. OGC mapping services and untiled layers also supported.;Fast & Mobile Ready - Mobile support out of the box. Build lightweight custom profiles with just the components you need.;Vector Layers - Render vector data from GeoJSON, TopoJSON, KML, GML, and a growing number of other formats.;Cutting Edge & Easy to Customize - Map rendering leverages WebGL, Canvas 2D, and all the latest greatness from HTML5. Style your map controls with straight-forward CSS.	Get accurate ETAs with routing algorithms that use rich map data sets and dynamically updated information.; Solve complex real-world use cases without any additional coding; Routing instructions in 108 languages for different modes of travel: car, foot, bicycle, motorcycle and public transit
Statistics
Stacks 776	Stacks 7
Followers 462	Followers 12
Votes 57	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 15 Flexibility 11 Maturity 8 Open Source 7 Incredibly comprehensive, excellent support 4 Choice of map providers	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript iOS Android OS

What are some alternatives to OpenLayers, HERE Routing?

Google Maps

Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow.

Mapbox

We make it possible to pin travel spots on Pinterest, find restaurants on Foursquare, and visualize data on GitHub.

Leaflet

Leaflet is an open source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. It is developed by Vladimir Agafonkin of MapBox with a team of dedicated contributors. Weighing just about 30 KB of gzipped JS code, it has all the features most developers ever need for online maps.

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap is built by a community of mappers that contribute and maintain data about roads, trails, cafés, railway stations, and much more, all over the world.

ArcGIS

It is a geographic information system for working with maps and geographic information. It is used for creating and using maps, compiling geographic data, analyzing mapped information, sharing and much more.

CSV2GEO

It provides live conversion of batch addresses into geographic coordinates (address to lat long) or turn coordinates into well formatted address. It creates and publishes interactive maps.

MapTiler

It is a software for map tile rendering. It has been designed for producing seamless maps and aerial photo layers covering whole countries. The rendering is fast and efficient, and it can fully utilize multiple CPUs to 100%.

MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME is an open source cross-platform offline maps application, built on top of crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data. It was publicly released for iOS and Android.

LocationIQ

Free and Fast Geocoding Service

Stadia Maps

We enable devs to contextualize their data on a map and build complicated apps involving routing, time zones, and more with our APIs. We hate billing surprises as much as you, and if you send us an email, you'll get a real human reply.

Related Comparisons

HERE Routing vs OpenLayers: What are the differences?

Data sources: HERE Routing primarily uses HERE Maps data, which includes real-time traffic data, road networks, and points of interest. On the other hand, OpenLayers allows users to define their own data sources, enabling more flexibility in the choice of mapping data.
API ease of use: HERE Routing offers a set of APIs tailored specifically for routing functionalities, making it straightforward for developers to implement routing features. In contrast, OpenLayers is a more general mapping library that includes routing capabilities as part of its larger set of features, which may require more effort to set up for routing purposes.
Customization options: OpenLayers provides extensive customization options for map styling and interactivity, allowing developers to create highly customized mapping experiences. In comparison, HERE Routing focuses more on providing pre-packaged routing features with limited customization capabilities.
Geocoding capabilities: HERE Routing includes geocoding services as part of its routing platform, allowing users to convert addresses into geographic coordinates for routing purposes. OpenLayers, on the other hand, does not provide built-in geocoding capabilities and requires integration with external geocoding services for address conversion.
Offline routing: HERE Routing offers offline routing capabilities, allowing users to plan routes even without an internet connection by pre-downloading map data. OpenLayers does not natively support offline routing, requiring continuous internet access for routing functionalities.

In Summary, the key differences between HERE Routing and OpenLayers lie in their data sources, API ease of use, customization options, geocoding capabilities, and offline routing support.

HERE Routing vs OpenLayers

Overview