StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Homebrew vs MacPorts

Homebrew vs MacPorts

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Homebrew
Homebrew
Stacks591
Followers515
Votes3
GitHub Stars45.3K
Forks10.6K
MacPorts
MacPorts
Stacks2
Followers1
Votes0

Homebrew vs MacPorts: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When it comes to package managers for macOS, two popular options are Homebrew and MacPorts. Both tools allow users to easily install and manage software packages on their Mac systems. However, there are key differences between the two that users should be aware of before choosing which one to use.

1. **Package Sources**: One significant difference between Homebrew and MacPorts is where they source their packages from. Homebrew pulls software packages directly from the upstream source code repositories, ensuring users have access to the latest versions. On the other hand, MacPorts ports its software packages from source code tarballs, which can sometimes lead to a delay in getting the most up-to-date versions.

2. **Build Process**: Another difference lies in the build process each tool uses. Homebrew strives for simplicity by using pre-compiled binaries whenever possible, reducing the time it takes to install packages. In contrast, MacPorts typically builds packages from source, which can result in longer installation times but allows for more customization and control over the build process.

3. **User Interface**: Homebrew focuses on providing a user-friendly and straightforward command-line interface for managing packages. It aims to make the package installation process as simple as possible for users. MacPorts, on the other hand, offers a more in-depth and complex command-line interface, giving users fine-grained control over package configurations and dependencies.

4. **Package Dependencies**: Homebrew tends to favor minimalistic installations, only installing dependencies when explicitly required by the user. This approach can lead to quicker installations and less clutter on the system. MacPorts, on the other hand, installs all dependencies by default, ensuring that packages are fully functional but potentially resulting in a larger disk space footprint.

5. **Community and Support**: Homebrew has a larger and more active community of users and contributors compared to MacPorts. This can result in more frequent updates, better documentation, and a quicker response to issues and bug fixes. MacPorts, while still well-supported, may not have the same level of community engagement and support as Homebrew.

6. **Integration with macOS System Tools**: Homebrew is designed to be more integrated with macOS system tools and APIs, providing a seamless experience for users. MacPorts, while powerful and flexible, may not always align perfectly with macOS conventions, potentially leading to compatibility issues or conflicts with system components.

In Summary, Homebrew and MacPorts have distinct approaches to package management on macOS, with Homebrew focusing on simplicity and user-friendliness, while MacPorts offers more customization and control options for advanced users.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Homebrew
Homebrew
MacPorts
MacPorts

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

The MacPorts Project is an open-source community initiative to design an easy-to-use system for compiling, installing, and upgrading either command-line, X11 or Aqua based open-source software on the Mac OS X operating system.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
45.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
591
Stacks
2
Followers
515
Followers
1
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Clean, neat, powerful, fast and furious
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
cURL
cURL
GNU Bash
GNU Bash
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Homebrew, MacPorts?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

fpm

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot