Hug vs Spark Framework | What are the differences? | StackShare

Hug vs Spark Framework

Overview

Hug

Stacks14

Followers55

Votes12

Spark Framework

Stacks39

Followers91

Votes7

GitHub Stars9.7K

Forks1.6K

Hug vs Spark Framework: What are the differences?

Developers describe Hug as "New Python REST API and CLI micro-framework". Hug aims to make developing Python driven APIs as simple as possible, but no simpler. As a result, it drastically simplifies Python API development. On the other hand, Spark Framework is detailed as "A micro framework for creating web applications in Kotlin and Java 8 with minimal effort". It is a simple and expressive Java/Kotlin web framework DSL built for rapid development. Its intention is to provide an alternative for Kotlin/Java developers that want to develop their web applications as expressive as possible and with minimal boilerplate.

Hug and Spark Framework can be primarily classified as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

Hug is an open source tool with 5.82K GitHub stars and 343 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Hug's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Microframeworks on StackShare

Hamilton Microframeworks

A scalable general purpose micro-framework for defining dataflows

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Advice on Hug, Spark Framework

Juan José

May 1, 2020

Decided

I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:

Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).

Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.

35.9k views35.9k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hug	Spark Framework
Hug aims to make developing Python driven APIs as simple as possible, but no simpler. As a result, it drastically simplifies Python API development.	It is a simple and expressive Java/Kotlin web framework DSL built for rapid development. Its intention is to provide an alternative for Kotlin/Java developers that want to develop their web applications as expressive as possible and with minimal boilerplate.
-	Built for productivity; Lets you take full advantage of the JVM
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 9.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.6K
Stacks 14	Stacks 39
Followers 55	Followers 91
Votes 12	Votes 7
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Simple 2 Elegant 2 Self documenting 2 REST 2 Fast	Pros 2 Very easy to get up and running. Lovely API 1 Java 1 Easy 1 Fast 1 Ideal for microservices
Integrations
Python	Kotlin Java

What are some alternatives to Hug, Spark Framework?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.