StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Icinga vs OpenTelemetry

Icinga vs OpenTelemetry

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Icinga
Icinga
Stacks120
Followers97
Votes0
OpenTelemetry
OpenTelemetry
Stacks206
Followers148
Votes4

Icinga vs OpenTelemetry: What are the differences?

Introduction

Icinga and OpenTelemetry are both monitoring tools used for system health and performance tracking. While both tools serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them that cater to different user needs and preferences.

  1. Architecture: Icinga is a standalone monitoring tool with its own database backend for storing monitoring data, whereas OpenTelemetry is designed as a set of APIs, libraries, agents, and instrumentation to enable observability in applications and services. OpenTelemetry promotes a more distributed architecture compared to the centralized approach of Icinga.

  2. Flexibility: Icinga primarily focuses on monitoring infrastructure and network components through its configuration-based approach, whereas OpenTelemetry is more focused on application performance monitoring and observability by offering a flexible and customizable framework for collecting telemetry data from different sources.

  3. Community Support: Icinga has a large and active open-source community that contributes to the development and support of the tool, providing a wide range of plugins and extensions for various use cases. OpenTelemetry, on the other hand, is backed by major technology companies such as Google, Microsoft, and others, which ensures continuous development, updates, and support for the tool.

  4. Data Collection: Icinga uses its own data collection and reporting mechanisms, which can be extended through plugins and integrations. OpenTelemetry, on the other hand, follows open standards and protocols for data collection, making it easier to integrate with other observability tools and platforms in the ecosystem.

  5. Monitoring Scope: Icinga is more suitable for traditional IT infrastructure monitoring, such as servers, networks, and services, offering detailed insights into system health and performance metrics. OpenTelemetry, on the other hand, is designed to provide end-to-end visibility into cloud-native applications, microservices, and containerized environments, focusing on distributed tracing, metrics, and logs for modern architectures.

In Summary, Icinga and OpenTelemetry differ in architecture, flexibility, community support, data collection methods, and monitoring scope, catering to distinct monitoring needs in IT infrastructure and cloud-native environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Icinga
Icinga
OpenTelemetry
OpenTelemetry

It monitors availability and performance, gives you simple access to relevant data and raises alerts to keep you in the loop. It was originally created as a fork of the Nagios system monitoring application.

It provides a single set of APIs, libraries, agents, and collector services to capture distributed traces and metrics from your application. You can analyze them using Prometheus, Jaeger, and other observability tools.

Statistics
Stacks
120
Stacks
206
Followers
97
Followers
148
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    OSS

What are some alternatives to Icinga, OpenTelemetry?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana