StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Ignite UI vs Kendo UI

Ignite UI vs Kendo UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K
Ignite UI
Ignite UI
Stacks10
Followers37
Votes17

Ignite UI vs Kendo UI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ignite UI and Kendo UI are two popular frameworks for building modern web applications. Both frameworks offer a wide range of UI components and tools. However, there are several key differences between Ignite UI and Kendo UI that developers should be aware of before choosing the right framework for their project.

  1. Component Variety: Ignite UI provides a comprehensive selection of UI components, including data grids, charts, maps, gauges, and many more. On the other hand, Kendo UI offers a similar range of components but focuses more on enterprise-level applications, providing additional features such as tree grids, pivot grids, and gantt charts.

  2. Open Source vs. Commercial: Ignite UI is an open-source framework, allowing developers to use and modify the source code freely. In contrast, Kendo UI is a commercial framework that requires a license for commercial use, although it provides a free version with limited features.

  3. Integration with Other Frameworks: Ignite UI is specifically designed to integrate seamlessly with Angular, React, and Web Components, making it a great choice for developers working with these frameworks. In comparison, Kendo UI supports integration with a wider range of frameworks, including Angular, React, Vue, and jQuery.

  4. Themes and Styling Options: Ignite UI provides a wide range of built-in themes and extensive customization options to help developers match their application's look and feel. Kendo UI also offers a variety of themes but provides more advanced styling capabilities, making it easier to create custom themes and apply them consistently across different components.

  5. Documentation and Support: Both frameworks have comprehensive documentation, including API references, tutorials, and sample code. However, Kendo UI offers additional support services such as dedicated technical support, forums, and live chat, which can be beneficial for developers who require more assistance during development.

  6. Performance and Size: Ignite UI has a smaller footprint and offers better performance compared to Kendo UI, making it a suitable choice for applications that prioritize speed and efficiency. However, Kendo UI provides more extensive functionality and features, which can result in a larger bundle size and potentially slower loading times.

In summary, while Ignite UI and Kendo UI offer a similar range of UI components, they differ in terms of component variety, open-source vs. commercial licensing, integration with other frameworks, themes and styling options, documentation and support, as well as performance and size considerations. Developers should carefully evaluate these differences to choose the framework that best suits their project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Ignite UI
Ignite UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Ignite UI is a fast, feature-rich component library for building modern, responsive apps. With enterprise-grade performance, it handles complex data and workflows, offering advanced grids, charts, editors, and more for data-driven apps.

Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
Data Grid;Hierarchical Data Grid;Tree Grid;Advanced Combo;Advanced Charting;Advanced Editors;Pivot Grid;Sparkline;Pure JavaScript Excel Library;jQuery UI;ASP.NET MVC
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
297
Stacks
10
Followers
359
Followers
37
Votes
33
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    Built-in router
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Awdawd
  • 1
    Expensive
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
Pros
  • 3
    Fastest Grids and Charts
  • 2
    Handles large data volumes
  • 2
    Handles heavy workloads/high data volumes
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Quick and easy to use
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS
Web Components
Web Components
React
React
Blazor
Blazor
Angular
Angular

What are some alternatives to Kendo UI, Ignite UI?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase