StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Famous Framework vs Kendo UI vs ShieldUI

Famous Framework vs Kendo UI vs ShieldUI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K
ShieldUI
ShieldUI
Stacks3
Followers11
Votes0
Famous Framework
Famous Framework
Stacks4
Followers47
Votes0
GitHub Stars394
Forks65

Famous Framework vs Kendo UI vs ShieldUI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

We will discuss the key differences between Famous Framework, Kendo UI, and ShieldUI.

  1. Architecture and Design Patterns: Famous Framework is focused on declarative, reusable components, while Kendo UI and ShieldUI are more traditional, object-oriented frameworks.

  2. Performance Optimization: Kendo UI and ShieldUI offer extensive performance optimization tools and features, while Famous Framework focuses more on visual effects and animations.

  3. Community Support and Ecosystem: Kendo UI has a large and active community, with a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions, while ShieldUI and Famous Framework have smaller communities and fewer resources available.

  4. Customization and Theming: ShieldUI provides more customization options and theming capabilities out of the box, compared to Kendo UI and Famous Framework.

  5. Compatibility and Browser Support: Kendo UI has better compatibility and support for various browsers, including older versions, compared to Famous Framework and ShieldUI.

  6. Cost and Licensing: Famous Framework is open-source and free to use, while Kendo UI and ShieldUI require a license for commercial use, with Kendo UI being more expensive than ShieldUI.

In Summary, the key differences between Famous Framework, Kendo UI, and ShieldUI lie in their architectural approach, performance optimization, community support, customization capabilities, compatibility, and cost.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
ShieldUI
ShieldUI
Famous Framework
Famous Framework

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

We offer a rich suite, which includes over 40 different component types and spans over multiple development platforms.

The Famous Framework is a new JavaScript framework for creating reusable, composable, and interchangeable UI widgets and applications. It balances declarative with imperative and functional with stateful, and it's built on top of the Famous Engine.

Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
JavaScript/HTML5 widgets for client-side development;ASP.NET server controls with advanced data binding;ASP.NET MVC components for tight integration with models and views;Apache Wicket components for leveraging JAVA development;A cloud SaaS solution for creating and sharing reports online;Native Image export and Print options;HTML5 and legacy browser support
Reusability / interchangability. The Famous Framework is built around powerful constraints and a declarative syntax that make it possible for components to be reused and interchanged.;Application consistency. In an ecosystem where widgets/applications/utilities all follow the same guidelines, developers and designers both reap the benefits: less trial and error when attempting to integrate with others' projects.;Integration with existing web standards. Although our integration is far from complete, from the beginning we've aimed to design and build the framework around existing web standards.;Static analyzability: Components that follow the constraints established by the Famous Framework can be staticaly analyzed, which hints at some exciting possibilities for tools and services that could be built on top.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
394
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
65
Stacks
297
Stacks
3
Stacks
4
Followers
359
Followers
11
Followers
47
Votes
33
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    AngularJS
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Awdawd
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
  • 1
    Poor customizability
No community feedback yet
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS
No integrations available
Famo.us
Famo.us

What are some alternatives to Kendo UI, ShieldUI, Famous Framework?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase