StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Inferno vs Semantic UI React vs Svelte

Inferno vs Semantic UI React vs Svelte

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Inferno
Inferno
Stacks25
Followers64
Votes20
Svelte
Svelte
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.6K
Votes502
GitHub Stars84.6K
Forks4.7K
Semantic UI React
Semantic UI React
Stacks227
Followers382
Votes28
GitHub Stars13.3K
Forks4.1K

Inferno vs Semantic UI React vs Svelte: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing a UI framework for web development, developers often consider various options available in the market. Two popular choices are Inferno and Semantic UI React. Svelte is also gaining popularity for its simplicity and performance. Below are the key differences between Inferno, Semantic UI React, and Svelte.

  1. Performance: Inferno is known for its exceptional performance due to its minimalistic approach and virtual DOM rendering. Svelte also focuses on performance by compiling components at build time, resulting in smaller bundle size and faster loading times. Semantic UI React, while still performant, may not match the level of optimization offered by Inferno and Svelte.

  2. Learning Curve: Semantic UI React provides a rich set of pre-designed components and themes, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing interfaces without much effort. Inferno, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of its lightweight API and lifecycle methods to fully utilize its capabilities. Svelte boasts a simple and intuitive syntax that can be easily picked up by beginners, offering a smooth learning curve.

  3. Bundle Size: Inferno is renowned for its small bundle size, making it an ideal choice for projects where optimizing for performance and loading speed is crucial. Svelte, with its compiler that converts components into highly optimized JavaScript code, also results in minimal bundle sizes. Semantic UI React, while feature-rich, may contribute to larger bundle sizes due to its extensive library of components.

  4. Reactivity System: In Svelte, reactivity is built-in at a compiler level, allowing developers to declare reactive statements directly in the markup without the need for additional state management libraries. Inferno also offers reactivity through its own implementation of virtual DOM and state management. Semantic UI React relies more on traditional state management libraries like Redux for reactivity, which can add complexity to the codebase.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Semantic UI React benefits from the wide adoption of the Semantic UI framework, offering a large community with active support and a vast ecosystem of themes and plugins. Inferno, while not as widely adopted as React, still has a dedicated community and ecosystem to support developers. Svelte, being a newer framework, has a growing community and ecosystem but may have fewer resources compared to more established frameworks.

  6. Integration with Existing Projects: Semantic UI React seamlessly integrates with React projects, providing a set of components that align with React's component-based architecture. Inferno, being React-like in its structure, can also be easily integrated into existing React projects with minimal changes. Svelte, on the other hand, requires a different approach to building components and may not be as straightforward to integrate into existing React projects.

In Summary, the key differences between Inferno, Semantic UI React, and Svelte revolve around performance, learning curve, bundle size, reactivity system, community and ecosystem, and integration with existing projects, catering to different preferences and project requirements in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Inferno, Svelte, Semantic UI React

Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments
Raj
Raj

Oct 10, 2020

Review

It purely depends on your app needs. Does it need to be scalable, do you have lots of features, OR it is a simple project with very simple needs - many of those parameters clarify which technologies will fit.

If you are looking for a quick solution, that reduces lot of development time, take a look at postgraphile (https://www.graphile.org/postgraphile/). You have to just define the schema and you get the entire graph-ql apis built for you and you can just focus on your frontend.

On frontend, React is good, but also need to remember that it is popular because it introduced one way data writes and in-built virtual dom + diffing to determine which dom to modify. Though personally I liked it, am recently more inclined to Svelte because its lightweightedness and absence of virtual dom and its simplicity compared to the huge ecosystem that React has surrounded itself with.

In all situations, frameworks keep changing over time. What is best today is not considered even good few years from now. What is important is to have the logic in a separate, clean manner void of too many framework related dependencies - that way you can switch one framework with another very easily.

3.77k views3.77k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Full-stack software engineer

Apr 25, 2020

Decided

Svelte 3 is exacly what I'm looking for that Vue is not made for.

It has a iterable dom just like angular but very low overhead.

This is going to be used with the application.

for old/ lite devices . ie.

  • android tv,
  • micro linux,
  • possibly text based web browser for ascci and/or linux framebuffer
  • android go devices
  • android One devices
125k views125k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Inferno
Inferno
Svelte
Svelte
Semantic UI React
Semantic UI React

Inferno is an isomorphic library for building high-performance user interfaces, which is crucial when targeting mobile devices. Unlike typical virtual DOM libraries like React, Mithril, Virtual-dom, Snabbdom and Om, Inferno uses techniques to separate static and dynamic content. This allows Inferno to only "diff" renders that have dynamic values.

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Semantic UI React is the official React integration for Semantic UI. jQuery Free, Declarative API, Shorthand Props, and more.

One of the fastest front-end frameworks for rendering UI in the DOM;Components have a similar API to React ES2015 components with inferno-component;Stateless components are fully supported and have more usability thanks to Inferno's hooks system;Isomorphic/universal for easy server-side rendering with inferno-server
Write less code; No virtual DOM; Truly reactive
No jQuery dependency;No animation dependencies;Reuse SUI CSS transitions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
84.6K
GitHub Stars
13.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
4.1K
Stacks
25
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
227
Followers
64
Followers
1.6K
Followers
382
Votes
20
Votes
502
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Faster than React
  • 4
    React-like api
  • 3
    Smaller bundles
  • 3
    Compatibility package for existing React apps
  • 3
    Faster than Vue
Pros
  • 59
    Performance
  • 41
    Reactivity
  • 36
    Components
  • 35
    Simplicity
  • 34
    Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
Cons
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Hard to learn
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Complex
  • 2
    Little to no libraries
Pros
  • 10
    Great look&feel
  • 6
    Really adaptive -good support of different screen sizes
  • 5
    Great lib, lots of components enough to build a big app
  • 3
    Extensible and lots of components but no transitions
  • 2
    Documentation is also understandable
Cons
  • 3
    Poor Documentation
Integrations
No integrations availableNo integrations available
React
React
Semantic UI
Semantic UI

What are some alternatives to Inferno, Svelte, Semantic UI React?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase