Iron vs Nameko

Overview

Iron

Stacks97

Followers29

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.1K

Forks397

Nameko

Stacks20

Followers79

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks468

Iron vs Nameko: What are the differences?

Scalability: Iron is known for its scalability and supports horizontal scaling by adding more servers to handle increasing workloads. Nameko, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for horizontal scaling and relies on manual adjustments to handle increased demands.
Programming Language: Iron is written in Rust, known for its performance, memory safety, and concurrency. In contrast, Nameko is written in Python, which offers simplicity and ease of use but may not match the performance capabilities of Rust.
Framework Architecture: Iron follows a more minimalist approach, providing only essential functionalities to build web applications. Nameko, as a microservices framework, focuses on developing distributed applications with separate services communicating over a network.
Middleware Support: Iron has limited middleware support, requiring developers to write custom middleware for specific needs. Nameko comes with built-in support for middleware functionalities, making it easier to incorporate middleware into applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Iron has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Nameko, which has a more extensive user base and resources available for developers seeking help or extensions for their projects.
Ease of Use: Nameko is designed to be developer-friendly with a more approachable learning curve, making it ideal for rapid prototyping and developing microservices applications. Iron, while powerful, may require a steeper learning curve due to its focus on performance and low-level optimizations.

In Summary, Iron and Nameko differ in terms of scalability, programming language, framework architecture, middleware support, community size, and ease of use, making each suitable for distinct development scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Iron, Nameko

Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Nameko

RabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Iron	Nameko
Iron is a high level web framework built in and for Rust, built on hyper. Iron is designed to take advantage of Rust's greatest features - its excellent type system and its principled approach to ownership in both single threaded and multi threaded contexts.	Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.
-	Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars 6.1K	GitHub Stars 4.8K
GitHub Forks 397	GitHub Forks 468
Stacks 97	Stacks 20
Followers 29	Followers 79
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Rust	Django Slack Python Redis Sentry SQLAlchemy

What are some alternatives to Iron, Nameko?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Iron vs Nameko: What are the differences?

Scalability: Iron is known for its scalability and supports horizontal scaling by adding more servers to handle increasing workloads. Nameko, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for horizontal scaling and relies on manual adjustments to handle increased demands.
Programming Language: Iron is written in Rust, known for its performance, memory safety, and concurrency. In contrast, Nameko is written in Python, which offers simplicity and ease of use but may not match the performance capabilities of Rust.
Framework Architecture: Iron follows a more minimalist approach, providing only essential functionalities to build web applications. Nameko, as a microservices framework, focuses on developing distributed applications with separate services communicating over a network.
Middleware Support: Iron has limited middleware support, requiring developers to write custom middleware for specific needs. Nameko comes with built-in support for middleware functionalities, making it easier to incorporate middleware into applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Iron has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Nameko, which has a more extensive user base and resources available for developers seeking help or extensions for their projects.
Ease of Use: Nameko is designed to be developer-friendly with a more approachable learning curve, making it ideal for rapid prototyping and developing microservices applications. Iron, while powerful, may require a steeper learning curve due to its focus on performance and low-level optimizations.

Iron vs Nameko

Overview