Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

IronWorker

30
17
+ 1
0
OpenFaaS

55
229
+ 1
17
Add tool

IronWorker vs OpenFaaS: What are the differences?

Introduction

IronWorker and OpenFaaS are both serverless computing platforms, but they have key differences in their features and functionalities.

  1. Execution Environment: IronWorker uses a container-based execution environment, where each task runs in a separate container. On the other hand, OpenFaaS utilizes a serverless architecture with functions that are executed in lightweight containers, providing more flexibility and scalability.

  2. Programming Language Support: IronWorker supports a limited number of programming languages, including Ruby, Node.js, Python, and Java. OpenFaaS, however, offers support for a wider range of languages such as Go, Python, Node.js, Ruby, and even custom binaries, making it more versatile for developers.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: IronWorker has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to OpenFaaS, which has a larger and more active community. OpenFaaS also has a vast collection of community-contributed plugins and templates, making it easier for developers to extend and customize their serverless functions.

  4. Deployment Flexibility: IronWorker requires tasks to be uploaded to its platform for execution, while OpenFaaS allows functions to be deployed on any container orchestrator, such as Kubernetes or Docker Swarm. This gives developers more control over their deployment environment and strategy.

  5. Pricing Model: IronWorker has a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed amount based on the number of tasks and their runtime. OpenFaaS, on the other hand, offers a more flexible pricing model based on resource consumption, making it potentially more cost-effective for organizations with fluctuating workloads.

  6. Integration Capabilities: OpenFaaS provides built-in integrations with popular tools and services such as Prometheus, Grafana, and Kubernetes, making it easier for developers to monitor and manage their serverless functions. IronWorker also offers integrations but may not have the same level of compatibility with a wide range of tools.

In Summary, IronWorker and OpenFaaS differ in their execution environment, programming language support, community size, deployment flexibility, pricing model, and integration capabilities.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of IronWorker
Pros of OpenFaaS
  • 0
    Ease of configuration
  • 0
    Great customer support
  • 0
    Fully on-premise deployable
  • 0
    Cloud agnostic
  • 0
    Language agnostic
  • 0
    Can run Docker containers
  • 5
    Open source
  • 4
    Ease
  • 3
    Autoscaling
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 1
    Async

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is IronWorker?

IronWorker provides the muscle for modern applications by efficiently isolating the code and dependencies of individual tasks to be processed on demand. Run in a multi-language containerized environment with streamlined orchestration, IronWorker gives you the flexibility to power any task in parallel at massive scale.

What is OpenFaaS?

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use IronWorker?
What companies use OpenFaaS?
See which teams inside your own company are using IronWorker or OpenFaaS.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with IronWorker?
What tools integrate with OpenFaaS?
    No integrations found
    What are some alternatives to IronWorker and OpenFaaS?
    Lineman
    Lineman is a command-line utility that is hyper-focused on helping web developers build first-class JavaScript web applications. Lineman provides a thin wrapper around a number of client-side productivity tools (primarily Express, Grunt, and Testem), with the goal of helping developers focus on writing awesome web apps instead of worrying about workflow configuration.
    AWS Lambda
    AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.
    Serverless
    Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.
    Azure Functions
    Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.
    Apex
    Apex is a small tool for deploying and managing AWS Lambda functions. With shims for languages not yet supported by Lambda, you can use Golang out of the box.
    See all alternatives