StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Isotope vs Mosaic

Isotope vs Mosaic

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Isotope
Isotope
Stacks58
Followers21
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.1K
Forks1.4K
Mosaic
Mosaic
Stacks1
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars386
Forks10

Isotope vs Mosaic: What are the differences?

Isotope and Mosaic are two popular JavaScript libraries used for creating interactive websites. While both libraries offer similar functionalities, they have some key differences that set them apart. Below are the key differences between Isotope and Mosaic:

1. **Layout Engine**:
Isotope uses a masonry layout engine, allowing for a flexible grid layout with various sized items. Mosaic, on the other hand, uses a responsive grid layout that adjusts based on the screen size, making it ideal for creating adaptive designs.

2. **Filtering and Sorting**:
Isotope provides advanced filtering and sorting options for the items in the layout, allowing users to easily customize the display. Mosaic, on the contrary, focuses more on the visual representation of the content rather than complex filtering and sorting functions.

3. **Animation Effects**:
Isotope offers a wide range of animation effects that can be applied to the layout elements, enhancing the user experience. Mosaic, while also supporting animations, has a more minimalistic approach when it comes to visual effects.

4. **Browser Compatibility**:
Isotope has better browser compatibility, supporting a wide range of browsers without any significant issues. Mosaic, on the other hand, might have some limitations in terms of browser support, especially for older versions.

5. **Documentation and Support**:
Isotope has extensive documentation and a large community of users, making it easier to find resources and solutions to common problems. Mosaic, being a newer library, might have fewer resources available and may require more troubleshooting.

6. **Customization Options**:
Isotope offers more customization options for developers, allowing them to tweak every aspect of the layout to suit their specific needs. Mosaic, while customizable to some extent, may not provide the same level of flexibility as Isotope in terms of design modifications.

In Summary, Isotope and Mosaic differ primarily in their layout engine, filtering and sorting capabilities, animation effects, browser compatibility, documentation and support, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Isotope
Isotope
Mosaic
Mosaic

It is a JavaScript library that makes it easy to sort, filter, and add Masonry layouts to items on a webpage

A declarative front-end JavaScript library for building user interfaces. Component-Based making pieces of code reusable and keep track of their own data, actions, lifecycle functions, and more.

Dynamic sorting; Filtering of content right in the browser
Component-Based; Observable Data; Smart DOM; Built-in Router; State Manager; Small Library Size; Tagged Template Li
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.1K
GitHub Stars
386
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
10
Stacks
58
Stacks
1
Followers
21
Followers
13
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
WordPress
WordPress
HTML5
HTML5
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Isotope, Mosaic?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase