StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. JavaFX vs Qt

JavaFX vs Qt

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Qt
Qt
Stacks464
Followers637
Votes138
JavaFX
JavaFX
Stacks280
Followers418
Votes11

JavaFX vs Qt: What are the differences?

Introduction

JavaFX and Qt are both popular frameworks for creating graphical user interfaces (GUIs) in various programming languages. While both frameworks have similarities in terms of providing tools and functionality for GUI development, there are several key differences between them that developers should be aware of. In this article, we will explore six major differences between JavaFX and Qt.

  1. Language Support: JavaFX is primarily used with Java programming language, making it a great choice for Java developers. On the other hand, Qt supports multiple programming languages including C++, Python, and JavaScript, providing developers with more flexibility in their choice of programming language.

  2. Community and Support: JavaFX has a large and active community, with a wealth of online resources, tutorials, and forums available for developers to seek help and share knowledge. Qt also has a strong community, with a dedicated team of developers and active forums, but it may not be as extensive as the JavaFX community.

  3. Platform Support: JavaFX is designed to be platform-independent and can run on multiple operating systems, including Windows, Mac, and Linux. Qt also provides cross-platform support, but it goes beyond desktop applications and extends to embedded systems and mobile platforms, such as Android and iOS.

  4. UI Design Approach: JavaFX follows a more declarative approach for UI design, allowing developers to define the UI components and their properties using XML-based markup language (FXML). Qt, on the other hand, uses a more programmatic approach, where UI components and their properties are created and manipulated directly in code.

  5. Customization and Theming: JavaFX provides a rich set of built-in UI controls and styles, allowing developers to create visually appealing applications without much customization. Qt, on the other hand, offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to create custom UI controls and apply custom themes to achieve a unique and tailored look for their applications.

  6. Integration with Native Features: JavaFX provides limited integration with native features of the underlying platform, such as system tray icons and file system access. Qt, on the other hand, offers seamless integration with native features, allowing developers to leverage platform-specific functionality and provide a more native user experience.

In summary, JavaFX and Qt differ in terms of language support, community and support, platform support, UI design approach, customization and theming options, and integration with native features. Developers should consider these differences when choosing a framework for GUI development based on their specific requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Qt
Qt
JavaFX
JavaFX

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

Statistics
Stacks
464
Stacks
280
Followers
637
Followers
418
Votes
138
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    High Performance
  • 13
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 12
    Performance
  • 12
    Cross platform
  • 9
    Fast prototyping
Cons
  • 5
    Paid
  • 4
    C++ is not so productive
  • 2
    Lack of community support
  • 1
    Not detailed documentation
  • 1
    Lack of libraries
Pros
  • 11
    Light
Cons
  • 1
    Community support less than qt
  • 1
    Complicated

What are some alternatives to Qt, JavaFX?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase