StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. JavaFX vs Qt5

JavaFX vs Qt5

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JavaFX
JavaFX
Stacks280
Followers418
Votes11
Qt5
Qt5
Stacks91
Followers136
Votes12

JavaFX vs Qt5: What are the differences?

Introduction

JavaFX and Qt5 are popular frameworks used for building cross-platform applications. While both have similarities, there are key differences that differentiate them. In this article, we will explore the key differences between JavaFX and Qt5.

  1. Architecture and Language: JavaFX is based on the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern and uses Java as the primary programming language. On the other hand, Qt5 follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern and is predominantly written in C++.

  2. Platform Support: JavaFX is primarily designed to run on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and is supported on various platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux. Qt5, on the other hand, is a cross-platform framework that supports a wide range of platforms including desktop, embedded, and mobile operating systems.

  3. Native Look and Feel: Qt5 provides native look and feel for its applications by utilizing platform-specific libraries. This enables Qt5 applications to seamlessly integrate with the underlying operating system, resulting in a consistent user experience. JavaFX, on the other hand, uses its own rendering engine and does not provide native look and feel out of the box.

  4. UI Design Tools: Qt5 provides a powerful UI design tool called Qt Designer, which allows developers to visually design user interfaces using drag and drop functionality. Qt Designer generates code that can be seamlessly integrated into Qt applications. JavaFX, on the other hand, does not have a dedicated visual UI design tool and relies on programmatically creating user interfaces using Java code or FXML files.

  5. Community and Documentation: JavaFX has a large and active community, with plenty of resources and documentation available. It also benefits from being part of the wider Java ecosystem, which has a vast number of libraries and frameworks. Qt5 also has a strong community and provides comprehensive documentation, although it may not be as extensive as JavaFX due to the vastness of the overall Qt framework.

  6. License: JavaFX is now open source and is released under the GNU General Public License (GPL) with the Classpath Exception, meaning it can be used freely in both open source and commercial applications. Qt5, on the other hand, offers both open source and commercial licenses. The open source version is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which has certain obligations for distributing the applications.

In Summary, JavaFX and Qt5 differ in their architectural patterns, language used, platform support, native look and feel, UI design tools, community and documentation, and licensing options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JavaFX
JavaFX
Qt5
Qt5

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

-
full development framework ; Internationalization support; embedded toolchains
Statistics
Stacks
280
Stacks
91
Followers
418
Followers
136
Votes
11
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Light
Cons
  • 1
    Complicated
  • 1
    Community support less than qt
Pros
  • 2
    Very good documentation
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 2
    C++
  • 2
    Fast enough
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to JavaFX, Qt5?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Element

Element

Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase