StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. JBoss Seam vs JSF

JBoss Seam vs JSF

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSF
JSF
Stacks138
Followers223
Votes4
JBoss Seam
JBoss Seam
Stacks8
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars32
Forks51

JBoss Seam vs JSF: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between JBoss Seam and JSF. Both JBoss Seam and JSF are frameworks that are used in Java web development. While JSF is a standalone framework, JBoss Seam is an extension of JSF that provides additional features and functionality.

  1. Architecture: The architecture of JBoss Seam and JSF differs significantly. JSF follows a component-based architecture, where the application is built around reusable UI components. On the other hand, JBoss Seam follows a conversational component-based architecture, which allows for more complex conversation and business process management.

  2. Scope Management: JSF provides various scopes to manage the lifecycle and state of components, such as request, view, session, and application scopes. JBoss Seam, in addition to these scopes, introduces some additional scopes like conversation scope, which allows for better management of long-running user interactions.

  3. Contextual Injection: JBoss Seam provides a powerful feature called contextual injection, which allows components to be automatically injected with contextual references based on their declared dependencies. This greatly simplifies the development process and eliminates the need for manual dependency injection. JSF, on the other hand, does not have this feature and relies on other dependency injection frameworks like CDI.

  4. Event Handling: JBoss Seam provides a built-in event model that allows components to raise and handle events. This enables loose coupling between components and promotes better scalability and reusability. JSF does not have a built-in event model, although it can still be achieved by integrating JSF with other frameworks like CDI.

  5. Data Binding: JBoss Seam provides advanced data binding capabilities, allowing for seamless binding of UI components to managed beans without the need for additional configuration. JSF also supports data binding, but it requires more manual configuration and is not as seamless as in JBoss Seam.

  6. Exception Handling: JBoss Seam provides a comprehensive exception handling mechanism that allows for centralized exception handling and logging. It also provides features like retry, redirect, and page-level exception handling. JSF does not have a built-in exception handling mechanism and relies on other frameworks for handling exceptions.

In summary, JBoss Seam extends the functionality of JSF by providing additional features like conversation management, contextual injection, built-in event handling, advanced data binding, and comprehensive exception handling. These additional features make JBoss Seam a more powerful and efficient framework for developing complex Java web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSF
JSF
JBoss Seam
JBoss Seam

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

It is an application framework for Enterprise Java. It is inspired by the following principles: One kind of "stuff" Seam defines a uniform component model for all business logic in your application.

-
Solder; Apache DeltaSpike; Seam Catch; Apache DeltaSpike; Seam Config; Apache Aries
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
32
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
51
Stacks
138
Stacks
8
Followers
223
Followers
15
Votes
4
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle
  • 1
    Server Side component
  • 1
    Very Mature UI framework
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java
Java
Java EE
Java EE
Java
Java
Jira
Jira
Java EE
Java EE

What are some alternatives to JSF, JBoss Seam?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase