StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Jetty vs NGINX Unit

Jetty vs NGINX Unit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit
Stacks86
Followers199
Votes11
GitHub Stars5.6K
Forks365

Jetty vs NGINX Unit: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key Differences between Jetty and NGINX Unit:

1. Architecture: Jetty is a Java-based web server and servlet container that can be embedded in applications, providing flexibility and customization options for developers. On the other hand, NGINX Unit is a polyglot application server that supports a range of programming languages, with a focus on microservices and containerized environments. Jetty follows a traditional Java-based architecture, while NGINX Unit is designed for modern, microservices-based applications.

2. Configuration: Jetty typically requires XML configuration files for setting up server configurations, which can be verbose and complex for some users. In contrast, NGINX Unit offers a more streamlined and user-friendly configuration approach through its JSON-based configuration format, making it easier to manage and maintain server settings. NGINX Unit's configuration is often considered more intuitive and concise than Jetty's XML-based configuration.

3. Module Ecosystem: Jetty has a rich ecosystem of Java-based modules and extensions that can be leveraged to enhance the server's functionality and performance. NGINX Unit, on the other hand, has a more limited module ecosystem focused on supporting specific programming languages and technologies commonly used in modern applications. Developers familiar with Java-centric environments may find Jetty's module ecosystem more comprehensive and versatile.

4. Performance: Jetty is known for its high performance and scalability, particularly in enterprise-level applications where thousands of concurrent connections are required. NGINX Unit also offers excellent performance and low resource consumption, making it suitable for high-throughput microservices architectures. Both servers are capable of handling large volumes of traffic efficiently, but Jetty's Java-based architecture may provide a performance edge in certain use cases.

5. Logging and Monitoring: Jetty provides robust logging and monitoring capabilities through its integration with popular logging frameworks like Log4j and SLF4J. NGINX Unit includes built-in logging and monitoring features that can be easily configured and customized to meet specific requirements. Developers looking for comprehensive logging and monitoring capabilities out-of-the-box may prefer NGINX Unit over Jetty's more customizable, but potentially complex, logging setup.

6. Community Support: Jetty has a strong and active community of developers and users who contribute to its ongoing development and support resources. NGINX Unit, while backed by the reputable NGINX organization, may have a smaller community compared to Jetty, which could impact the availability of community-contributed resources and expertise. Depending on the level of community support desired, developers may choose Jetty for its established community or NGINX Unit for its association with a well-known web server brand.

In Summary, Jetty and NGINX Unit differ in architecture, configuration approach, module ecosystem, performance, logging and monitoring capabilities, and community support, making them suitable for different types of applications and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

NGINX Unit is a dynamic web application server, designed to run applications in multiple languages. Unit is lightweight, polyglot, and dynamically configured via API. The design of the server allows reconfiguration of specific application parameters as needed by the engineering or operations.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
Fully dynamic reconfiguration using RESTful JSON API;Multiple application languages and versions can run simultaneously;Dynamic application processes management (coming soon);TLS support (coming soon);TCP, HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2 routing and proxying (coming soon)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
365
Stacks
510
Stacks
86
Followers
311
Followers
199
Votes
47
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Very thin
Cons
  • 0
    Student
Pros
  • 3
    PHP
  • 2
    Multilang
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Python
  • 1
    Ruby
Integrations
No integrations available
Perl
Perl
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Jetty, NGINX Unit?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase