StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Graph Databases
  4. Graph Databases
  5. JGraphT vs Neo4j

JGraphT vs Neo4j

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Neo4j
Neo4j
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.4K
Votes351
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.5K
JGraphT
JGraphT
Stacks8
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks849

JGraphT vs Neo4j: What are the differences?

  1. Supported Graph Structures: JGraphT is a Java library that provides mathematical graph-theory objects and algorithms, allowing users to work with a wide range of graph structures such as directed, undirected, weighted, unweighted, multigraphs, pseudographs, and more. On the other hand, Neo4j is a graph database management system that allows the storage, query, and analysis of large-scale graph data in a distributed and scalable manner. It supports advanced graph structures and properties such as nodes, relationships, properties, labels, and indexes.

  2. Query Capabilities: JGraphT provides algorithms and functions for traversing and querying graphs, but it does not offer a dedicated query language or indexing mechanism like Neo4j. Neo4j, on the other hand, supports a flexible and expressive query language called Cypher, which allows users to perform complex graph queries and analysis efficiently. It also provides indexing features to optimize query performance.

  3. Storage Model: JGraphT is an in-memory graph library, meaning the graph data is stored in the computer's memory while the program is running. It does not provide persistent storage options by default. In contrast, Neo4j is a disk-based graph database that offers persistent storage of graph data on disk. This allows large-scale graph datasets to be stored and accessed even when the application is not actively running.

  4. Fault Tolerance and Scalability: JGraphT is primarily designed for single-machine environments and does not directly support fault tolerance or distributed processing. On the other hand, Neo4j is built for distributed environments and offers features like data replication, clustering, and fault tolerance that enable efficient processing of large-scale graph datasets across multiple machines.

  5. Transaction Management: JGraphT does not provide built-in transaction management capabilities. However, it can be used within Java applications that implement their own transaction management mechanisms. Neo4j, on the other hand, provides transactional semantics to ensure data consistency and integrity. It supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions and allows users to define and execute complex operations within a single transaction.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: JGraphT has an active open-source community and provides ongoing development and support. It offers a range of community-driven resources such as documentation, forums, and sample code. Neo4j also has a thriving community and offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and a range of additional tools and extensions. It has a larger ecosystem built around graph database use cases and provides commercial support options.

In Summary, JGraphT is a Java library for graph-theory objects and algorithms, while Neo4j is a distributed graph database management system. JGraphT focuses on providing graph structures and algorithms for in-memory processing, while Neo4j offers advanced querying capabilities, persistent storage, fault tolerance, scalability, transaction management, and a larger ecosystem for graph data management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Neo4j
Neo4j
JGraphT
JGraphT

Neo4j stores data in nodes connected by directed, typed relationships with properties on both, also known as a Property Graph. It is a high performance graph store with all the features expected of a mature and robust database, like a friendly query language and ACID transactions.

It is an open source library of graph-theoretic data structures and algorithms. It has been used in a number of university projects and classes, and shows up as a standard reference in books on Java programming.

intuitive, using a graph model for data representation;reliable, with full ACID transactions;durable and fast, using a custom disk-based, native storage engine;massively scalable, up to several billion nodes/relationships/properties;highly-available, when distributed across multiple machines;expressive, with a powerful, human readable graph query language;fast, with a powerful traversal framework for high-speed graph queries;embeddable, with a few small jars;simple, accessible by a convenient REST interface or an object-oriented Java API
Flexible; Powerfull; Efficient
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
849
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
8
Followers
1.4K
Followers
15
Votes
351
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 69
    Cypher – graph query language
  • 61
    Great graphdb
  • 33
    Open source
  • 31
    Rest api
  • 27
    High-Performance Native API
Cons
  • 9
    Comparably slow
  • 4
    Can't store a vertex as JSON
  • 1
    Doesn't have a managed cloud service at low cost
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
DBFlow
DBFlow
Java
Java
Xtend
Xtend
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines

What are some alternatives to Neo4j, JGraphT?

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Dgraph

Dgraph

Dgraph's goal is to provide Google production level scale and throughput, with low enough latency to be serving real time user queries, over terabytes of structured data. Dgraph supports GraphQL-like query syntax, and responds in JSON and Protocol Buffers over GRPC and HTTP.

RedisGraph

RedisGraph

RedisGraph is a graph database developed from scratch on top of Redis, using the new Redis Modules API to extend Redis with new commands and capabilities. Its main features include: - Simple, fast indexing and querying - Data stored in RAM, using memory-efficient custom data structures - On disk persistence - Tabular result sets - Simple and popular graph query language (Cypher) - Data Filtering, Aggregation and ordering

Cayley

Cayley

Cayley is an open-source graph inspired by the graph database behind Freebase and Google's Knowledge Graph. Its goal is to be a part of the developer's toolbox where Linked Data and graph-shaped data (semantic webs, social networks, etc) in general are concerned.

guava

guava

The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.

Thymeleaf

Thymeleaf

It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.

JSF

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Blazegraph

Blazegraph

It is a fully open-source high-performance graph database supporting the RDF data model and RDR. It operates as an embedded database or over a client/server REST API.

JavaMelody

JavaMelody

It is used to monitor Java or Java EE application servers in QA and production environments. It is not a tool to simulate requests from users, it is a tool to measure and calculate statistics on real operation of an application depending on the usage of the application by users. It is mainly based on statistics of requests and on evolution charts.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase