StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. JHipster vs PHP-MVC

JHipster vs PHP-MVC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3
JHipster
JHipster
Stacks200
Followers327
Votes0
GitHub Stars22.2K
Forks4.1K

JHipster vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing JHipster and PHP-MVC, there are some significant differences that developers need to consider. Both are popular web frameworks but have distinctive features that set them apart.

  1. Architecture: JHipster is a full-stack development platform that generates code for both the backend (Spring Boot) and the frontend (Angular/React/Vue). On the other hand, PHP-MVC is a lightweight framework that follows the Model-View-Controller architecture using PHP for backend development. JHipster provides a more structured and opinionated approach to development, while PHP-MVC offers more flexibility and customization options.

  2. Technology Stack: JHipster uses Java-based technologies such as Spring Boot, Maven, and Angular/React/Vue for the frontend. PHP-MVC, as the name suggests, is based on PHP and can be easily integrated with popular frontend technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. JHipster leverages the power of Java ecosystem, while PHP-MVC relies on PHP's simplicity and ease of use.

  3. Code Generation: JHipster is known for its powerful code generation capabilities, which can quickly scaffold a new project with all the necessary files, configurations, and boilerplate code. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, requires developers to write more code manually due to its lightweight nature. JHipster's code generation feature can significantly speed up development time and reduce human errors.

  4. Community Support: JHipster has a large and active community of developers, who regularly contribute new features, fixes, and plugins to the platform. This strong community support ensures that developers have access to a wealth of resources and expertise when working with JHipster. PHP-MVC also has a community of users, but it may not be as extensive or well-established as JHipster's community.

In Summary, JHipster offers a full-stack development experience with Java-based technologies and powerful code generation capabilities, while PHP-MVC provides a lightweight and flexible framework based on PHP and the Model-View-Controller architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
JHipster
JHipster

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
22.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.1K
Stacks
106
Stacks
200
Followers
222
Followers
327
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PHP-MVC, JHipster?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase