StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Jinja vs React

Jinja vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Jinja
Jinja
Stacks2.3K
Followers292
Votes8
GitHub Stars11.2K
Forks1.7K

Jinja vs React: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Jinja and React

Jinja and React are both widely used technologies in web development, but they differ in several key aspects. Below, we will discuss the six main differences between Jinja and React.

  1. Rendering Approach: Jinja is a template engine used for server-side rendering, where HTML templates are rendered on the server and sent to the client as complete HTML pages. On the other hand, React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces that focuses on client-side rendering, where the UI components are rendered and updated on the client-side, usually using a virtual DOM.

  2. Programming Language: Jinja is based on the Python programming language and allows the use of Python code within its templates. In contrast, React is primarily based on JavaScript, and it uses JSX (a syntax extension for JavaScript) to define components and their rendering logic.

  3. Components: React follows a component-based architecture, where the UI is composed of reusable and independent components. These components encapsulate their state and render logic, making it easier to build complex UIs. Jinja, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for components like React. It mainly focuses on template inheritance and includes template logic with macros and filters.

  4. Reactivity: React introduces a reactive programming model, allowing components to automatically update when their underlying state changes. It achieves this through a virtual DOM and a diffing algorithm, which optimizes the rendering process. Jinja, being a server-side rendering engine, does not provide reactivity out of the box. Any updates to the page would require a complete re-rendering on the server.

  5. Data Flow: React utilizes a unidirectional data flow, known as one-way binding, where data is passed from parent components to child components in a hierarchical manner. This promotes a predictable flow of data and simplifies debugging. Jinja, on the other hand, does not enforce a specific data flow pattern as it primarily focuses on rendering templates based on data passed into it.

  6. Development Tools and Ecosystem: React has a rich ecosystem and community support, providing a wide range of development tools, libraries, and resources for building modern web applications. It offers features like hot reloading, debugging tools, and a vast collection of third-party libraries. Jinja, being a templating engine, has a more limited ecosystem and is mainly used in Python web development frameworks like Flask and Django.

In summary, Jinja and React differ in their rendering approach, programming language used, component architecture, reactivity support, data flow pattern, and development tools and ecosystem. Proper selection between these technologies depends on the specific requirements of your web application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Jinja

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Jinja
Jinja

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
11.2K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
147.0K
Followers
292
Votes
4.1K
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 8
    It is simple to use
Integrations
No integrations available
Ember.js
Ember.js
Git
Git
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to React, Jinja?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase