StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Jinja2 vs Scala

Jinja2 vs Scala

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Scala
Scala
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
GitHub Stars14.4K
Forks3.1K
Jinja
Jinja
Stacks2.3K
Followers292
Votes8
GitHub Stars11.2K
Forks1.7K

Jinja2 vs Scala: What are the differences?

Jinja2 vs Scala

Jinja2 and Scala are both popular programming languages used in web development and data processing. While both offer their own set of features and advantages, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Syntax and Usage: Jinja2 is a templating engine for Python, used primarily for generating dynamic web pages and emails. It provides an easy-to-use and readable syntax, with support for control structures, variables, filters, and template inheritance. Scala, on the other hand, is a general-purpose programming language that runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and is known for its conciseness and scalability. It offers a strong static type system and functional programming capabilities.

  2. Conciseness and Readability: Jinja2 aims to provide a human-readable template syntax, making it easy for non-programmers to understand and modify templates. It focuses on simplicity and clarity, using familiar HTML-like tags and expressions. In contrast, Scala is a more verbose language with a steeper learning curve. It allows for more expressive and powerful code constructs, but may be less intuitive for beginners.

  3. Type System: Scala has a strong static type system that offers compile-time type checking and inference. This promotes type safety and helps catch errors early in the development process. Jinja2, on the other hand, is dynamically-typed, allowing for more flexibility and less stringent type requirements. This can be beneficial in certain scenarios where type checking is not as critical.

  4. Concurrency and Parallelism: Scala has built-in support for concurrency and parallelism with its actors, futures, and parallel collections. This makes it easy to write concurrent and scalable applications. Jinja2 does not have built-in concurrency features, as it is primarily designed for generating templates rather than managing concurrent tasks.

  5. Development Ecosystem: Scala has a large and active development ecosystem, with a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools available for various purposes, such as web development, data processing, and machine learning. Jinja2, being a templating engine, is more focused on template generation and does not have as extensive a development ecosystem.

  6. Community and Adoption: Scala is widely used in industry and has a large and active community of developers. It is often used in big data processing and streaming applications, as well as for building scalable web services. Jinja2, while popular in the Python community, is less commonly used in other programming languages.

In summary, Jinja2 is a lightweight templating engine for Python, offering an easy-to-use and readable syntax for generating dynamic web pages. Scala, on the other hand, is a general-purpose programming language with a strong type system and support for concurrency and parallelism. Both have their own strengths and use cases, and the choice between them depends on specific project requirements and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Scala, Jinja

Jakub
Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

We needed to incorporate Big Data Framework for data stream analysis, specifically Apache Spark / Apache Storm. The three options of languages were most suitable for the job - Python, Java, Scala.

The winner was Python for the top of the class, high-performance data analysis libraries (NumPy, Pandas) written in C, quick learning curve, quick prototyping allowance, and a great connection with other future tools for machine learning as Tensorflow.

The whole code was shorter & more readable which made it easier to develop and maintain.

290k views290k
Comments
zen
zen

Sep 26, 2019

Needs advice

Finding the best server-side tool for building a personal information organizer that focuses on performance, simplicity, and scalability.

performance and scalability get a prototype going fast by keeping codebase simple find hosting that is affordable and scales well (Java/Scala-based ones might not be affordable)

306k views306k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Scala
Scala
Jinja
Jinja

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

-
Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.4K
GitHub Stars
11.2K
GitHub Forks
3.1K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
7.8K
Followers
292
Votes
1.5K
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 188
    Static typing
  • 178
    Pattern-matching
  • 175
    Jvm
  • 172
    Scala is fun
  • 138
    Types
Cons
  • 11
    Slow compilation time
  • 7
    Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
  • 6
    Too few developers available
  • 4
    Complicated subtyping
  • 2
    My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff
Pros
  • 8
    It is simple to use
Integrations
Java
Java
Ember.js
Ember.js
Git
Git
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Scala, Jinja?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase