StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Jinja2 vs Smarty

Jinja2 vs Smarty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jinja
Jinja
Stacks2.3K
Followers292
Votes8
GitHub Stars11.2K
Forks1.7K
Smarty
Smarty
Stacks3.2K
Followers71
Votes0

Jinja2 vs Smarty: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, template engines play a crucial role in separating the presentation layer from the business logic. Jinja2 and Smarty are two popular template engines used to generate dynamic content in web applications.

  1. Syntax Difference: Jinja2 uses double curly braces {{ }} for expressions and control statements, while Smarty uses a combination of { } and ... for the same purpose. This syntax difference can impact how developers write and manage templates in each template engine.

  2. Template Inheritance: Jinja2 supports template inheritance where a base template can define blocks that child templates can override. Smarty, on the other hand, does not provide built-in support for template inheritance. This lack of functionality in Smarty can make managing and reusing templates more challenging.

  3. Extensibility: Jinja2 allows developers to write custom filters, tests, and extensions to enhance template functionality. In contrast, Smarty has a limited set of built-in functionalities and lacks the extensibility offered by Jinja2. This difference can impact the flexibility and scalability of the template engine.

  4. Integration with Frameworks: Jinja2 is commonly used with Python web frameworks like Flask and Django, providing seamless integration and enhanced performance. In comparison, Smarty is primarily associated with PHP applications, limiting its usage in a broader range of web development frameworks. This difference in integration can influence the choice of template engine based on the underlying technology stack.

  5. Templating Language Features: Jinja2 offers advanced features like macros, autoescaping, and template includes, enhancing the ease of template development and readability. Smarty, on the other hand, provides simpler templating features without the same level of sophistication as Jinja2. This difference in templating language features can impact the learning curve and productivity of developers using each template engine.

  6. Community Support and Documentation: Jinja2 has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available for developers. In contrast, Smarty has a smaller community and limited documentation, which can make it more challenging for developers to find support and resources when using the template engine. This difference in community support can affect the adoption and maintenance of the template engine in web development projects.

In Summary, Jinja2 and Smarty differ in syntax, template inheritance, extensibility, framework integration, templating language features, and community support, influencing their suitability for different web development scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jinja
Jinja
Smarty
Smarty

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Facilitating the separation of presentation (HTML/CSS) from application logic. This implies that PHP code is application logic, and is separated from the presentation

Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
3.2K
Followers
292
Followers
71
Votes
8
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    It is simple to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ember.js
Ember.js
Git
Git
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jinja, Smarty?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase