StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Preact vs jQuery UI

Preact vs jQuery UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Stacks40.6K
Followers13.3K
Votes899
GitHub Stars11.3K
Forks5.3K
Preact
Preact
Stacks1.1K
Followers292
Votes28

Preact vs jQuery UI: What are the differences?

<The use of Preact and jQuery UI in web development offers various features and functionalities. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between these two tools.>

1. **Virtual DOM**: One major difference between Preact and jQuery UI is the way they handle the DOM. Preact utilizes a virtual DOM, which helps improve performance by minimizing updates to the actual DOM, making it faster than jQuery UI.
   
2. **Component-based vs. Widget-based**: Preact follows a component-based architecture, where UI elements are encapsulated within components, promoting reusability and maintainability. On the other hand, jQuery UI is widget-based, where components are more standalone and not as easily integrated into different parts of the application.

3. **Size and Performance**: Preact is significantly smaller in size compared to jQuery UI, making it a lightweight option for projects where performance is a priority. Due to its compact size, Preact tends to offer better performance, especially in applications with complex UI interactions.

4. **Native Rendering**: Preact has the advantage of native rendering, which allows it to function more efficiently compared to jQuery UI when manipulating state changes and rendering updates to the UI. This can result in smoother animations and interactions in the user interface.

5. **JSX Support**: Preact offers support for JSX syntax, allowing developers to write code in a more declarative and intuitive way. In contrast, jQuery UI does not provide built-in JSX support, which may lead to a less streamlined development experience, especially for complex UI structures.

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: While jQuery UI has been around for a longer period and has a large community backing, Preact has a growing community and ecosystem that is focused on modern web development practices. This can be advantageous for developers looking for up-to-date solutions and resources.

In Summary, Preact and jQuery UI differ in their handling of the DOM, architectural approach, size, performance, rendering capabilities, JSX support, and community focus, making them suitable for different types of web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery UI, Preact

David
David

VP Product at loveholidays

Oct 10, 2020

Review

Generally I would advise you pick Node.js for your backend if you want to run a GraphQL service. The main reason for this is the tooling and support you get from the language around GraphQL and the native feel due to the spec being initially written in JavaScrip for JavaScript. However that isn't to say that you couldn't use Go for a service underneath your GrahpQL layer - but I would say that's probably complicating it too much to begin with.

Node.js has great support for reading from databases and using a server such as Koa will give you great performance (we operate several Node.js services in Koa with over 1000req/s). Additionally it keeps your initial simple stack in the same language so it will be easier for you to jump backwards and forwards.

If you were not to use GraphQL then I'd say it's really up to you whether you want Go in your ecosystem or not. It's a fantastic language and super performant, along with being more memory efficient than Node (if you are worried about costs at large scale).

If you're at infancy stages and haven't picked certain parts - and this is a customer facing application - then I would recommend you look at Preact instead of React and URQL (instead of Apollo Client). Both are great libraries that are very performant and don't need much advanced learning. Additional swap out MySQL for PostgresSQL (they are interop primarily, but offers you more features as you grow) for its ACID compliance, better performance at scale and support for NoSQL if you were to go that way.

3.57k views3.57k
Comments
Damiano
Damiano

Oct 27, 2019

Decided

Preact offers an API which is extremely similar to React's for less than 10% of its size (and createElement is renamed to h, which makes the overall bundle a lot smaller). Although it is less compatible with other libraries than the latter (and its ecosystem is nowhere as developed), this is generally not a problem as Preact exposes the preact/compat API, which can be used as an alias both for React and ReactDOM and allows for the use of libraries which would otherwise just be compatible with React.

25.6k views25.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Preact
Preact

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
40.6K
Stacks
1.1K
Followers
13.3K
Followers
292
Votes
899
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 215
    Ui components
  • 156
    Cross-browser
  • 121
    Easy
  • 100
    It's jquery
  • 81
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Does not contain charts or graphs
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Drop-in replacement for React
  • 4
    Performance
  • 3
    Props/state passed to render
  • 1
    ES6 class components
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to jQuery UI, Preact?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase