StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. jQuery UI vs vue-jazzicon

jQuery UI vs vue-jazzicon

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Stacks40.6K
Followers13.3K
Votes899
GitHub Stars11.3K
Forks5.3K
vue-jazzicon
vue-jazzicon
Stacks0
Followers8
Votes0
GitHub Stars44
Forks2

jQuery UI vs vue-jazzicon: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with Frameworks: jQuery UI is designed to work seamlessly with jQuery, allowing developers to easily enhance functionality and interface elements of their website. On the other hand, vue-jazzicon is specifically built for Vue.js, providing a set of Vue components and directives to create and customize jazzicon avatars.
  2. Component Library: jQuery UI offers a wide range of pre-built UI components, such as dialogs, date pickers, and progress bars, that can be easily integrated into web applications. In contrast, vue-jazzicon focuses specifically on generating jazzicon avatars, which are pixelated identicons based on Ethereum addresses.
  3. Size and Performance: Due to its nature as a component library, jQuery UI can be significantly larger in terms of codebase and file size. This can impact the performance of a web page, especially on mobile devices or with slower internet connections. vue-jazzicon, being a more specialized library, tends to have a smaller footprint and better performance.
  4. Ease of Use: jQuery UI provides a set of user-friendly APIs and documentation that make it relatively easy for developers to implement and customize UI components. On the other hand, vue-jazzicon may require more familiarity with Vue.js and its component-based architecture in order to effectively leverage its features.
  5. Community and Support: jQuery UI has been around for a long time and has a large community of developers, which means there is a wealth of resources, tutorials, and third-party plugins available. In comparison, vue-jazzicon is a relatively newer library and may have a smaller community and fewer resources available.
  6. Compatibility and Browser Support: jQuery UI is designed to work across various browsers and versions, offering better cross-browser compatibility. vue-jazzicon, being built specifically for Vue.js, may have better compatibility within the Vue ecosystem but may require additional configuration or polyfills for older browsers.

In Summary, jQuery UI and vue-jazzicon differ in terms of their framework integration, component libraries, size and performance, ease of use, community and support, and compatibility and browser support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
vue-jazzicon
vue-jazzicon

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

This component is made to be identical to the visual identifiers present in the metamask project, in order to create visual continuity between a dApp and the metamask plugin which may be used to sign ethereum transactions.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.3K
GitHub Stars
44
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
2
Stacks
40.6K
Stacks
0
Followers
13.3K
Followers
8
Votes
899
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 215
    Ui components
  • 156
    Cross-browser
  • 121
    Easy
  • 100
    It's jquery
  • 81
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Does not contain charts or graphs
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to jQuery UI, vue-jazzicon?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase