React Native for Windows vs jQuery

Overview

jQuery

Stacks195.3K

Followers70.6K

Votes6.6K

GitHub Stars59.6K

Forks20.5K

React Native for Windows

Stacks6

Followers29

Votes0

GitHub Stars17.1K

Forks1.2K

React Native for Windows vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will look at the key differences between React Native for Windows and jQuery.

Underlying Technology: React Native for Windows uses React Native, a framework developed by Facebook, which allows developers to create native applications using JavaScript. On the other hand, jQuery is a fast and concise JavaScript library that simplifies HTML document traversing, event handling, animating, and Ajax interactions. React Native for Windows provides a more robust and efficient framework for building native applications compared to jQuery.
Performance: React Native for Windows utilizes native components, which results in better performance compared to jQuery. Native components allow React Native to directly communicate with the device's platform-specific APIs, resulting in faster rendering and more responsive user interfaces. jQuery, on the other hand, relies on DOM manipulation, which can sometimes lead to slower performance, especially on mobile devices.
Community Support: React Native for Windows has a large and active community of developers who continuously contribute to the framework, provide support, and create libraries and tools to enhance the development process. jQuery also has a strong community support; however, the focus has shifted more towards newer frameworks and libraries. Developers may find more up-to-date resources and support within the React Native for Windows community.
Cross-Platform Development: React Native for Windows allows for the development of applications that can run on multiple platforms, including Windows, iOS, and Android, using a single codebase. jQuery, while versatile, is more commonly used for web development and may require additional tools and frameworks to achieve cross-platform compatibility. React Native for Windows offers a more streamlined approach to cross-platform development.
Learning Curve: React Native for Windows requires a good understanding of JavaScript and React to effectively build applications. Developers familiar with web development may find the transition to React Native for Windows smoother due to its use of familiar technologies like JavaScript. jQuery, on the other hand, is straightforward to learn and use, making it more accessible to beginners or developers looking for a quick and easy solution for web development tasks.
Complexity: React Native for Windows offers a more structured and organized approach to app development through the use of components, states, and props. This structured format can make it easier to scale and maintain applications as they grow in size and complexity. jQuery, while powerful for smaller projects, can become unwieldy and difficult to manage as projects increase in complexity.

In Summary, React Native for Windows stands out for its performance, cross-platform capabilities, and community support compared to jQuery, making it a robust choice for building native applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on jQuery, React Native for Windows

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k

Comments

Manatsawin

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

225k views225k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery	React Native for Windows
jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.	Adds support for the Windows 10 SDK, which allows you to build apps for all devices supported by Windows 10 including PCs, tablets, 2-in-1s, Xbox, Mixed reality devices etc.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.6K	GitHub Stars 17.1K
GitHub Forks 20.5K	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 195.3K	Stacks 6
Followers 70.6K	Followers 29
Votes 6.6K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1263 Cross-browser 957 Dom manipulation 809 Power 660 Open source 610 Plugins Cons 6 Large size 5 Encourages DOM as primary data source 5 Sometimes inconsistent API 2 Live events is overly complex feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	C# React Native React Visual Studio

What are some alternatives to jQuery, React Native for Windows?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

React Native for Windows vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will look at the key differences between React Native for Windows and jQuery.

Underlying Technology: React Native for Windows uses React Native, a framework developed by Facebook, which allows developers to create native applications using JavaScript. On the other hand, jQuery is a fast and concise JavaScript library that simplifies HTML document traversing, event handling, animating, and Ajax interactions. React Native for Windows provides a more robust and efficient framework for building native applications compared to jQuery.
Performance: React Native for Windows utilizes native components, which results in better performance compared to jQuery. Native components allow React Native to directly communicate with the device's platform-specific APIs, resulting in faster rendering and more responsive user interfaces. jQuery, on the other hand, relies on DOM manipulation, which can sometimes lead to slower performance, especially on mobile devices.
Community Support: React Native for Windows has a large and active community of developers who continuously contribute to the framework, provide support, and create libraries and tools to enhance the development process. jQuery also has a strong community support; however, the focus has shifted more towards newer frameworks and libraries. Developers may find more up-to-date resources and support within the React Native for Windows community.
Cross-Platform Development: React Native for Windows allows for the development of applications that can run on multiple platforms, including Windows, iOS, and Android, using a single codebase. jQuery, while versatile, is more commonly used for web development and may require additional tools and frameworks to achieve cross-platform compatibility. React Native for Windows offers a more streamlined approach to cross-platform development.
Learning Curve: React Native for Windows requires a good understanding of JavaScript and React to effectively build applications. Developers familiar with web development may find the transition to React Native for Windows smoother due to its use of familiar technologies like JavaScript. jQuery, on the other hand, is straightforward to learn and use, making it more accessible to beginners or developers looking for a quick and easy solution for web development tasks.
Complexity: React Native for Windows offers a more structured and organized approach to app development through the use of components, states, and props. This structured format can make it easier to scale and maintain applications as they grow in size and complexity. jQuery, while powerful for smaller projects, can become unwieldy and difficult to manage as projects increase in complexity.

In Summary, React Native for Windows stands out for its performance, cross-platform capabilities, and community support compared to jQuery, making it a robust choice for building native applications.