StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React Router vs jQuery

React Router vs jQuery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
React Router
React Router
Stacks5.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes14

React Router vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

React Router and jQuery are both popular libraries used for building web applications. However, they serve different purposes and have various key differences that set them apart.

Key Differences between React Router and jQuery

  1. Design Philosophy: React Router is a routing library specifically designed for building single-page applications (SPAs) using the React framework. It emphasizes declarative routing, where the routes are defined as components that render UI when a certain URL is matched. On the other hand, jQuery is a JavaScript library that simplifies the process of manipulating HTML documents, handling events, and making AJAX requests. It is more focused on providing a concise and powerful set of APIs for interacting with the DOM.

  2. Component-based vs DOM manipulation: React Router follows the component-based architecture, where routes are defined as components that can be nested and reused throughout the application. React Router relies on the React virtual DOM to efficiently update the UI when the URL changes. In contrast, jQuery primarily relies on manually manipulating the DOM to update the UI based on user actions or events.

  3. Complexity and Learning Curve: React Router has a steeper learning curve compared to jQuery. Since it is built on top of the React framework, developers need to have a good understanding of React concepts such as components, state, and props. On the other hand, jQuery has a simpler API and syntax, making it easier for developers to get started quickly.

  4. Performance: React Router leverages the virtual DOM and efficient diffing algorithms to update only the necessary components when the URL changes. This helps in improving performance by reducing unnecessary re-rendering of components. jQuery, on the other hand, directly manipulates the DOM, which can be less performant when dealing with large-scale applications.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: React Router is part of the larger React ecosystem, which is one of the most popular JavaScript libraries for building user interfaces. It has a large and active community, along with many third-party libraries and tools that seamlessly integrate with React. jQuery, on the other hand, has been around for a longer time and has a vast community and ecosystem of plugins and extensions developed over the years.

  6. Compatibility and Browser Support: React Router is designed to work primarily with modern web browsers that support the latest web standards. It utilizes features such as ES6 modules and the History API for seamless navigation. jQuery, on the other hand, has broader compatibility and works well with older browsers, making it suitable for building applications that need to support a wide range of browser versions.

In summary, React Router and jQuery differ in their design philosophy, approach to UI manipulation, complexity, performance, community support, and browser compatibility. React Router is more suited for building SPAs using component-based architecture, while jQuery is ideal for manipulating the DOM and handling events in a simpler and more concise manner.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery, React Router

Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments
kazi
kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k
Comments
Manatsawin
Manatsawin

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
React Router
React Router

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
5.2K
Followers
70.6K
Followers
1.1K
Votes
6.6K
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
Pros
  • 14
    Because there's not alternative
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to jQuery, React Router?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase