jQuery vs vue-next

Overview

jQuery

Stacks195.3K

Followers70.6K

Votes6.6K

GitHub Stars59.6K

Forks20.5K

vue-next

Stacks12

Followers14

Votes0

jQuery vs vue-next: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, jQuery and vue-next are popular tools used by developers for front-end development. Understanding the key differences between the two can help developers make informed decisions when choosing the right technology for their projects.

Performance: One key difference between jQuery and vue-next is performance. jQuery utilizes DOM manipulation directly, which can lead to slower rendering and performance issues when dealing with complex user interfaces. On the other hand, vue-next utilizes a virtual DOM, which allows for efficient updates and rendering, resulting in better performance and user experience.
Data Binding: Another significant difference is in how data binding is handled. jQuery does not provide built-in data binding capabilities, requiring developers to manually update the DOM when the data changes. In contrast, vue-next offers two-way data binding, simplifying the process of synchronizing the data between the view and the model.
Component-Based Architecture: vue-next follows a component-based architecture, where UI components are reusable and encapsulated, promoting code reusability and maintainability. jQuery, on the other hand, primarily focuses on DOM manipulation without a clear separation of concerns, leading to code complexity and difficulty in managing larger projects.
State Management: In terms of state management, vue-next comes with a built-in state management solution called Vuex, which helps manage the state of the application in a predictable and centralized manner. jQuery, however, lacks native support for state management, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or custom solutions, leading to potential inconsistencies and bugs in state management.
Community and Ecosystem: The respective communities and ecosystems of jQuery and vue-next differ significantly. jQuery has been around for a longer time and has a large ecosystem with numerous plugins and resources available. In contrast, vue-next, being a more modern framework, has a growing community with a focus on newer development practices and technologies, offering more up-to-date solutions to common front-end challenges.
Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, jQuery is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it accessible to beginners and experienced developers alike. Vue-next, while user-friendly, introduces concepts like components, directives, and state management that may require a bit more time and effort to grasp for those new to the framework.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between jQuery and vue-next in terms of performance, data binding, architecture, state management, community, ecosystem, and learning curve can help developers choose the right tool for their front-end development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on jQuery, vue-next

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k

Comments

Manatsawin

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

225k views225k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery	vue-next
jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.	It is the next major version of Vue. It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
-	Next major version of Vue; Single-File Component support; Support for vue-router; Support for vuex; Support for vue-cli; Support for vue-test-utils
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 20.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 195.3K	Stacks 12
Followers 70.6K	Followers 14
Votes 6.6K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1263 Cross-browser 957 Dom manipulation 809 Power 660 Open source 610 Plugins Cons 6 Large size 5 Encourages DOM as primary data source 5 Sometimes inconsistent API 2 Live events is overly complex feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Vue CLI vuex Vue Router

What are some alternatives to jQuery, vue-next?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

jQuery vs vue-next: What are the differences?

Performance: One key difference between jQuery and vue-next is performance. jQuery utilizes DOM manipulation directly, which can lead to slower rendering and performance issues when dealing with complex user interfaces. On the other hand, vue-next utilizes a virtual DOM, which allows for efficient updates and rendering, resulting in better performance and user experience.
Data Binding: Another significant difference is in how data binding is handled. jQuery does not provide built-in data binding capabilities, requiring developers to manually update the DOM when the data changes. In contrast, vue-next offers two-way data binding, simplifying the process of synchronizing the data between the view and the model.
Component-Based Architecture: vue-next follows a component-based architecture, where UI components are reusable and encapsulated, promoting code reusability and maintainability. jQuery, on the other hand, primarily focuses on DOM manipulation without a clear separation of concerns, leading to code complexity and difficulty in managing larger projects.
State Management: In terms of state management, vue-next comes with a built-in state management solution called Vuex, which helps manage the state of the application in a predictable and centralized manner. jQuery, however, lacks native support for state management, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or custom solutions, leading to potential inconsistencies and bugs in state management.
Community and Ecosystem: The respective communities and ecosystems of jQuery and vue-next differ significantly. jQuery has been around for a longer time and has a large ecosystem with numerous plugins and resources available. In contrast, vue-next, being a more modern framework, has a growing community with a focus on newer development practices and technologies, offering more up-to-date solutions to common front-end challenges.
Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, jQuery is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it accessible to beginners and experienced developers alike. Vue-next, while user-friendly, introduces concepts like components, directives, and state management that may require a bit more time and effort to grasp for those new to the framework.

jQuery vs vue-next

Overview