StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material-UI vs jQWidgets

Material-UI vs jQWidgets

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Material-UI vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Material-UI and jQWidgets are popular UI component libraries used in web development. Both offer a range of components to enhance user interfaces, but there are key differences between them that developers should consider before choosing one for their project.

1. **Design Philosophy**: Material-UI follows Google's Material Design guidelines, offering a clean and modern look to applications. On the other hand, jQWidgets focuses more on providing a wide variety of customizable UI components with a traditional design approach.

2. **Integration with React**: Material-UI is specifically designed for use with React, providing seamless integration with React applications. jQWidgets, on the other hand, can be used with various libraries and frameworks, making it more versatile but potentially less optimized for React.

3. **Component Customization**: Material-UI components have a more opinionated design, with limited customization options to maintain consistency with Material Design principles. In contrast, jQWidgets allows for extensive customization of its components to fit different design requirements.

4. **Community Support**: Material-UI has a large and active community, providing regular updates, documentation, and support for developers. jQWidgets also has a supportive community but may have fewer resources compared to Material-UI.

5. **Learning Curve**: Material-UI's components are designed with ease of use and developer experience in mind, making it easier for beginners to quickly get started with building interfaces. jQWidgets, with its wider range of components and customization options, may have a steeper learning curve for new users.

6. **Performance**: Material-UI focuses on providing optimized components for speed and performance, ensuring smooth user experience. jQWidgets, with its flexibility in customization, may require additional optimization efforts to achieve the same level of performance as Material-UI.

In Summary, Material-UI is ideal for React applications looking for a modern and sleek design with optimized performance, while jQWidgets offers a more traditional design approach with extensive customization options for various frameworks and libraries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, jQWidgets

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
jQWidgets
jQWidgets

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
14
Followers
3.7K
Followers
49
Votes
445
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
PHP
PHP
jQuery
jQuery
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, jQWidgets?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase