StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Mvc Tools
  5. PrimeNg vs jQWidgets

PrimeNg vs jQWidgets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PrimeNg
PrimeNg
Stacks229
Followers286
Votes15
GitHub Stars12.1K
Forks5.0K
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

PrimeNg vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown highlights the key differences between PrimeNg and jQWidgets for website development.

1. **Component Library**: PrimeNg provides a comprehensive component library with a wide range of UI components like buttons, forms, tables, and charts, while jQWidgets offers a smaller set of components with a focus on providing customizable widgets for web development.
   
2. **Dependencies**: PrimeNg is built on Angular, making it tightly integrated with Angular applications, whereas jQWidgets is a standalone library that can be used with various front-end frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue.js.
   
3. **Documentation**: PrimeNg offers extensive documentation with detailed examples, API references, and guides, making it easier for developers to get started with the library, while jQWidgets provides documentation that is not as comprehensive, leading to potential challenges for developers in understanding and implementing the components.
   
4. **Community Support**: PrimeNg has a larger and more active community of developers, resulting in frequent updates, bug fixes, and community-driven support through forums and GitHub, whereas jQWidgets has a smaller community, which may lead to slower updates and limited support options.
   
5. **License**: PrimeNg is distributed under the MIT license, allowing for commercial use and modification with minimal restrictions, whereas jQWidgets requires a commercial license for use in commercial projects, which may be a factor to consider for budget-conscious developers.
   
6. **Customization**: PrimeNg offers more flexibility for customization and theming of components through CSS classes and Angular's styling capabilities, while jQWidgets provides customization options through its API but may have limitations compared to PrimeNg in terms of design freedom. 

In Summary, PrimeNg and jQWidgets differ in their component library, dependencies, documentation, community support, license, and customization options, catering to different needs and preferences of web developers.  

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PrimeNg
PrimeNg
jQWidgets
jQWidgets

It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

Single library for all components; supports templating; Active development; offers a list of themes for UI components
Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.1K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
229
Stacks
14
Followers
286
Followers
49
Votes
15
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Complete
  • 4
    Wide range of components
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Modern UI components that work across the web
  • 1
    Already 17+ version up
Cons
  • 4
    Components are hard to customize
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Need to buy themes
  • 2
    Hard to understand
  • 2
    No documentation
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
Integrations
Angular
Angular
Angular CLI
Angular CLI
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
PHP
PHP
jQuery
jQuery
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to PrimeNg, jQWidgets?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase