StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Svelte vs jQWidgets

Svelte vs jQWidgets

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Svelte
Svelte
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.6K
Votes502
GitHub Stars84.6K
Forks4.7K
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Svelte vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

### Introduction
Svelte and jQWidgets are both popular tools in web development, but they have key differences that set them apart. Below are the main differences between Svelte and jQWidgets.

### 1. **Ease of Learning and Adoption**: Svelte is known for its simplicity and minimalistic approach, making it easier for developers to learn and adopt. On the other hand, jQWidgets comes with a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and complex APIs.

### 2. **Performance**: Svelte is a compiler-based framework that generates highly optimized vanilla JavaScript code during build time, resulting in better performance and faster load times. In contrast, jQWidgets relies on jQuery which can sometimes lead to slower performance due to additional abstraction layers.

### 3. **State Management**: Svelte embraces a reactive approach to state management, where changes in state automatically update the UI components without the need for additional data binding libraries. Meanwhile, jQWidgets requires manual data binding and event handling to manage state changes efficiently.

### 4. **Community and Support**: Svelte has a growing community of developers and active support from the core team, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and new features. In comparison, jQWidgets has been around for longer and has a more established community but may lack some of the modern features and updates present in newer frameworks.

### 5. **Component Reusability**: Svelte promotes the creation of reusable components with a clear separation of concerns, allowing for easier component maintenance and scalability. On the other hand, jQWidgets provides a wide range of pre-built UI components but may lack the flexibility and customization options offered by Svelte.

### 6. **Bundle Size**: Svelte's compiler generates highly optimized and leaner bundles compared to jQWidgets, resulting in smaller file sizes and improved performance, especially for projects aiming for fast load times and efficient resource utilization.

### Summary
In Summary, Svelte and jQWidgets differ in terms of ease of learning, performance, state management, community support, component reusability, and bundle size.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Svelte, jQWidgets

Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Full-stack software engineer

Apr 25, 2020

Decided

Svelte 3 is exacly what I'm looking for that Vue is not made for.

It has a iterable dom just like angular but very low overhead.

This is going to be used with the application.

for old/ lite devices . ie.

  • android tv,
  • micro linux,
  • possibly text based web browser for ascci and/or linux framebuffer
  • android go devices
  • android One devices
125k views125k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Svelte
Svelte
jQWidgets
jQWidgets

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

Write less code; No virtual DOM; Truly reactive
Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
84.6K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
14
Followers
1.6K
Followers
49
Votes
502
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 59
    Performance
  • 41
    Reactivity
  • 36
    Components
  • 35
    Simplicity
  • 34
    Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
Cons
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Little to no libraries
  • 2
    Complex
  • 2
    Hard to learn
  • 2
    Learning Curve
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
Integrations
No integrations available
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
PHP
PHP
jQuery
jQuery
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Svelte, jQWidgets?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase