StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Telerik UI vs jQWidgets

Telerik UI vs jQWidgets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Telerik UI
Telerik UI
Stacks19
Followers24
Votes0

Telerik UI vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

<In the world of web development, choosing the right UI framework is crucial for the success of any project. Telerik UI and jQWidgets are two popular frameworks that offer a multitude of components and tools to create user-friendly web applications. In order to make an informed decision, it is important to understand the key differences between these two frameworks. Below are the top 6 differences between Telerik UI and jQWidgets.>

1. **Component Variety**: Telerik UI offers a wider range of components compared to jQWidgets, including data visualization, data management, and editing components, providing developers with more options for building complex applications.
2. **Mobile Support**: Telerik UI provides comprehensive support for mobile devices, ensuring that applications built with this framework are responsive and optimized for mobile platforms. jQWidgets, on the other hand, may require additional customization to achieve the same level of mobile responsiveness.
3. **Documentation and Support**: Telerik UI is known for its extensive documentation and robust support services, making it easier for developers to troubleshoot issues and find resources to enhance their applications. jQWidgets, while also offering documentation, may not have the same level of community support and resources.
4. **Themes and Styling**: Telerik UI includes a wide variety of pre-designed themes and styling options, allowing developers to quickly customize the look and feel of their applications. jQWidgets, while offering some styling options, may not have the same extensive library of themes.
5. **Integration with Other Platforms**: Telerik UI seamlessly integrates with other popular platforms and technologies, such as Angular, React, and Vue.js, making it easier for developers to leverage existing tools and frameworks. jQWidgets, while also offering integrations, may not have the same level of compatibility with a wide range of platforms.
6. **Cost**: Telerik UI is a commercial framework that requires a paid license for full use, while jQWidgets offers both a commercial version and a free open-source version, making it more accessible for developers on a budget.

In Summary, when choosing between Telerik UI and jQWidgets, developers should consider factors such as component variety, mobile support, documentation, themes and styling, integration with other platforms, and cost to determine which framework best suits their project requirements and constraints.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Telerik UI
Telerik UI

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

It includes more than 100 versatile and performance-optimized components that help you build high-quality, professional line-of-business projects. From the leading AJAX data grid to the full-featured HTML editor used by Microsoft on sites like MSDN, It provides you with all the building blocks to maximize productivity and build richer, slicker and better-performing applications with ease.

Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Complete Set of Features and Controls; Seamless UX Across Devices and Browsers; 21 Built-In Professional Grade Skins
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
14
Stacks
19
Followers
49
Followers
24
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
PHP
PHP
jQuery
jQuery
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5
ASP.NET
ASP.NET

What are some alternatives to jQWidgets, Telerik UI?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase