JSONlite vs Scylla: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown document compares the key differences between JSONlite and Scylla.

1. **Data Model**: JSONlite stores data in a lightweight, text-based format based on JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), while Scylla is a distributed wide-column store NoSQL database based on Apache Cassandra with a Tabular-like data model.
2. **Query Language**: JSONlite does not have a specific query language as it uses JSON manipulations, whereas Scylla uses CQL (Cassandra Query Language) for querying the data stored in the database.
3. **Consistency**: JSONlite is typically used for small-scale applications or testing and does not guarantee high consistency levels, while Scylla is designed for high availability and strong consistency, making it suitable for large-scale applications requiring stringent consistency levels.
4. **Scalability**: JSONlite is not designed for distributed storage and does not offer built-in support for scalability across multiple nodes, whereas Scylla is designed for horizontal scalability with automatic partitioning and distribution of data across nodes in a cluster.
5. **Performance**: JSONlite is optimized for simplicity and minimal resource usage, making it fast for small datasets; however, Scylla is optimized for high performance with features like shard-aware drivers, high-throughput ingestion, and efficient data distribution for large datasets.
6. **Deployment**: JSONlite is typically used as embedded storage in applications or lightweight scenarios, whereas Scylla is deployed in distributed environments where high availability, performance, and scalability are crucial requirements.

In Summary, JSONlite and Scylla differ in data model, query language, consistency levels, scalability, performance, and deployment scenarios, making them suitable for different use cases based on specific requirements.