Jtwig vs Nunjucks: What are the differences?

Introduction: This Markdown document highlights the key differences between Jtwig and Nunjucks.

1. Syntax: Jtwig uses a more Java-like syntax, with tags enclosed in {% %} and output expressions in {{ }}, while Nunjucks adopts a syntax similar to JavaScript, with tags enclosed in {% %} and output expressions in {{ }}.

2. Extensibility: Jtwig offers more extensibility options, allowing users to create custom filters, functions, and tests easily, while Nunjucks has limited extensibility features compared to Jtwig.

3. Error Handling: Jtwig provides more detailed error messages and stack traces, which can be beneficial for debugging and troubleshooting, unlike Nunjucks, which may provide less detailed error information.

4. Performance: Jtwig tends to be faster in processing templates due to its optimization techniques, making it a better choice for performance-critical applications, whereas Nunjucks may be slightly slower in processing templates.

5. Template Inheritance: Jtwig supports template inheritance, which allows creating a base template that can be extended by other templates, facilitating code reuse and organization, while Nunjucks does not have built-in support for template inheritance, making code structuring less intuitive.

6. Built-in Functions: Jtwig includes a wide range of built-in functions for common tasks such as string manipulation, math operations, and date formatting, whereas Nunjucks has a more limited set of built-in functions available.

In Summary, the key differences between Jtwig and Nunjucks lie in their syntax, extensibility, error handling, performance, template inheritance, and built-in functions.