StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. JUCE vs NativeScript

JUCE vs NativeScript

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NativeScript
NativeScript
Stacks533
Followers1.1K
Votes516
GitHub Stars25.3K
Forks1.7K
JUCE
JUCE
Stacks39
Followers74
Votes10

JUCE vs NativeScript: What are the differences?

### Introduction

JUCE and NativeScript are two distinct frameworks that serve different purposes in the world of software development.

1. **Technological Focus**: JUCE is primarily aimed at creating audio applications, plugins, and software with rich graphical user interfaces, specializing in audio processing and graphic rendering. On the other hand, NativeScript is geared towards building cross-platform mobile applications using web technologies like JavaScript, CSS, and XML.

2. **Platform Support**: JUCE supports a wide range of platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, making it a versatile choice for multi-platform audio and graphic applications. In contrast, NativeScript focuses on mobile platforms such as iOS and Android, providing developers with tools to create native mobile apps using a single codebase.

3. **Language Used**: JUCE is typically used with C++ for developing applications, utilizing its power and performance benefits for audio and graphic processing tasks. In contrast, NativeScript allows developers to use JavaScript/TypeScript for building mobile applications, providing a more familiar and accessible language for web developers.

4. **UI Development**: JUCE offers a complete set of UI components and tools for creating complex graphical user interfaces, allowing for high customization and control over the visual aspect of applications. In comparison, NativeScript enables developers to create native user interfaces using CSS and XML, providing a framework to design responsive and visually appealing mobile apps.

5. **Community and Support**: JUCE has a strong community of audio developers, musicians, and graphic artists who contribute to its ecosystem, offering resources, tutorials, and plugins to enhance the development experience. NativeScript, on the other hand, benefits from being supported by Telerik, providing official documentation, forums, and plugins to assist developers in building cross-platform mobile apps.

6. **Deployment Options**: JUCE applications can be deployed as standalone executables or plugins for popular digital audio workstations (DAWs) and music production software, expanding their reach to a variety of users in the audio industry. In contrast, NativeScript apps are distributed through app stores like Apple App Store and Google Play Store, allowing them to reach a wider audience of mobile users across different platforms.

In Summary, JUCE and NativeScript differ in their technological focus, platform support, language usage, UI development capabilities, community support, and deployment options, catering to distinct development needs in the software industry.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

NativeScript
NativeScript
JUCE
JUCE

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

100% Access to Native Platform API;NativeScript is free of charge as an open source project;Code with JavaScript. Style with CSS;Cross-platform UI abstractions;Shared business logic and data models
For desktop and mobile; Building powerful and complex applications; User Interface & Graphics; Audio & plug-ins.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
25.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
533
Stacks
39
Followers
1.1K
Followers
74
Votes
516
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 75
    Access to the entire native api
  • 47
    Support for native ios and android libraries
  • 46
    Angular 2.0 support
  • 46
    Support for javascript libraries
  • 44
    Native ux and performance
Cons
  • 5
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Slower Performance compared to competitors
Pros
  • 4
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Fast
  • 1
    Nice GUI
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Open Source
Cons
  • 2
    Free Edition has Made with Juce
Integrations
No integrations available
Android OS
Android OS
React Native
React Native
C++
C++
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
iOS
iOS

What are some alternatives to NativeScript, JUCE?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase