StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Kendo UI vs Preact

Kendo UI vs Preact

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K
Preact
Preact
Stacks1.1K
Followers292
Votes28

Kendo UI vs Preact: What are the differences?

  1. Language and Framework: The key difference between Kendo UI and Preact lies in the fact that Kendo UI is a comprehensive framework that is used for building web applications using HTML, JavaScript, and CSS, while Preact is a lightweight alternative to React for building user interfaces with JavaScript.
  2. Size and Performance: Another important distinction is that Kendo UI is a feature-rich framework with a larger file size and more built-in functionalities, whereas Preact is a smaller library that focuses on performance and size efficiency, making it ideal for projects where performance is a priority.
  3. Component Architecture: Kendo UI provides a wide range of pre-built components and widgets, along with support for customization and extension, whereas Preact offers a minimalistic approach to components, emphasizing reusability and simplicity in component design.
  4. Community and Ecosystem: Kendo UI has a well-established community and ecosystem with extensive documentation, support, and third-party plugins available, while Preact has a smaller community but benefits from compatibility with existing React libraries and tools.
  5. Learning Curve: Kendo UI may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and API, whereas Preact is easier to learn and adopt, especially for developers familiar with React.
  6. License and Cost: Kendo UI has commercial licenses available for extended functionality and support, while Preact is open-source and free to use, making it more suitable for smaller projects or budget-conscious developers.

In Summary, Kendo UI is a comprehensive framework with a larger file size and feature set, while Preact is a lightweight library focused on performance and simplicity, making it a suitable choice for smaller projects or those emphasizing performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kendo UI, Preact

David
David

VP Product at loveholidays

Oct 10, 2020

Review

Generally I would advise you pick Node.js for your backend if you want to run a GraphQL service. The main reason for this is the tooling and support you get from the language around GraphQL and the native feel due to the spec being initially written in JavaScrip for JavaScript. However that isn't to say that you couldn't use Go for a service underneath your GrahpQL layer - but I would say that's probably complicating it too much to begin with.

Node.js has great support for reading from databases and using a server such as Koa will give you great performance (we operate several Node.js services in Koa with over 1000req/s). Additionally it keeps your initial simple stack in the same language so it will be easier for you to jump backwards and forwards.

If you were not to use GraphQL then I'd say it's really up to you whether you want Go in your ecosystem or not. It's a fantastic language and super performant, along with being more memory efficient than Node (if you are worried about costs at large scale).

If you're at infancy stages and haven't picked certain parts - and this is a customer facing application - then I would recommend you look at Preact instead of React and URQL (instead of Apollo Client). Both are great libraries that are very performant and don't need much advanced learning. Additional swap out MySQL for PostgresSQL (they are interop primarily, but offers you more features as you grow) for its ACID compliance, better performance at scale and support for NoSQL if you were to go that way.

3.56k views3.56k
Comments
Damiano
Damiano

Oct 27, 2019

Decided

Preact offers an API which is extremely similar to React's for less than 10% of its size (and createElement is renamed to h, which makes the overall bundle a lot smaller). Although it is less compatible with other libraries than the latter (and its ecosystem is nowhere as developed), this is generally not a problem as Preact exposes the preact/compat API, which can be used as an alias both for React and ReactDOM and allows for the use of libraries which would otherwise just be compatible with React.

25.6k views25.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Preact
Preact

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
297
Stacks
1.1K
Followers
359
Followers
292
Votes
33
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    AngularJS
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
  • 1
    Poor customizability
  • 1
    Expensive
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Drop-in replacement for React
  • 4
    Performance
  • 3
    Props/state passed to render
  • 1
    ES6 class components
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React

What are some alternatives to Kendo UI, Preact?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase