Kiwi

2
4
+ 1
0
Magneto

9
20
+ 1
0
Add tool

Magneto vs Kiwi: What are the differences?

Magneto: Android Test Automation. Magneto was built by Automation Engineers for Automation Engineers out of necessity for a mobile centric test automation framework that's easy to setup, run and utilize; Kiwi: Simple BDD for iOS. It is a Behavior Driven Development library for iOS development. The goal is to provide a BDD library that is exquisitely simple to setup and use.

Magneto and Kiwi can be primarily classified as "Mobile Testing Frameworks" tools.

Magneto and Kiwi are both open source tools. Kiwi with 4.05K GitHub stars and 505 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Magneto with 83 GitHub stars and 11 GitHub forks.

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

No Stats

What is Kiwi?

It is a Behavior Driven Development library for iOS development. The goal is to provide a BDD library that is exquisitely simple to setup and use.

What is Magneto?

Magneto was built by Automation Engineers for Automation Engineers out of necessity for a mobile centric test automation framework that's easy to setup, run and utilize.
What companies use Kiwi?
What companies use Magneto?
    No companies found

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Kiwi?
    What tools integrate with Magneto?
    What are some alternatives to Kiwi and Magneto?
    Appium
    Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.
    EarlGrey
    EarlGrey is a native iOS UI automation test framework that enables you to write clear, concise tests. With the EarlGrey framework, you have access to enhanced synchronization features. EarlGrey automatically synchronizes with the UI, network requests, and various queues; but still allows you to manually implement customized timings, if needed.
    Experitest
    It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers. Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics.
    Kobiton
    It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.
    pCloudy
    It is a smart mobile app testing solution that lets developers ensure their users enjoy a smooth and consistent experience. With it, developers can access manual and automated testing options to facilitate the swift debugging of their applications.
    See all alternatives
    Interest over time