Ktor vs Netty

Overview

Netty

Stacks264

Followers408

Votes17

GitHub Stars34.6K

Forks16.2K

Ktor

Stacks173

Followers339

Votes27

GitHub Stars14.1K

Forks1.2K

Ktor vs Netty: What are the differences?

Ktor is a modern and lightweight framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language. Netty, on the other hand, is a high-performance network application framework that provides an event-driven programming model.

Built-in Features: Ktor has built-in features such as routing, serialization, and HTTP handling, which make it easier for developers to build web applications. Netty, on the other hand, provides a lower-level network application framework and does not come with built-in features like routing and serialization.
Concurrency: Ktor uses Kotlin's coroutines to provide a powerful and efficient way of writing asynchronous code. This makes it easier for developers to handle concurrency and write scalable applications. Netty also supports asynchronous programming, but it uses a different approach with its own concurrency model.
Modularity: Ktor is designed to be highly modular, allowing developers to easily add or remove modules based on their requirements. This makes it flexible and allows for better code organization. Netty, on the other hand, provides a more monolithic framework with fewer options for customization and modularity.
Ease of Use: Ktor provides a simple and intuitive API that is easy to learn and use. It leverages Kotlin's language features and provides a DSL-like syntax for defining routes and handling requests. Netty, on the other hand, has a more complex API and requires more boilerplate code to achieve the same functionality.
Performance: Ktor is built on top of Netty and leverages its high-performance networking capabilities. However, Netty is a more low-level framework and provides finer-grained control over the networking layer, which can result in higher performance in certain use cases.
Community and Ecosystem: Ktor is a relatively new framework and has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Netty, which has been around for a longer time and has a larger and more mature community. This means that there are more resources, libraries, and tools available for Netty.

In summary, Ktor and Netty are both frameworks for building asynchronous servers and clients, but they have key differences in terms of built-in features, concurrency model, modularity, ease of use, performance, and community/ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Netty	Ktor
Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.	It is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language.
-	Unopinionated;Asynchronous;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 34.6K	GitHub Stars 14.1K
GitHub Forks 16.2K	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 264	Stacks 173
Followers 408	Followers 339
Votes 17	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 High Performance 4 Easy to use 3 Just like it 1 Easy to learn Cons 2 Limited resources to learn from	Pros 9 Simple & Small 8 Kotlin native 7 Light weight 3 High performance Cons 2 Not self-explanatory: relies on Kotlin "magic" 2 Relatively fresh technology - not a lot of expertise
Integrations
No integrations available	Linux Windows IntelliJ IDEA Kotlin macOS

What are some alternatives to Netty, Ktor?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

Related Comparisons

Ktor vs Netty: What are the differences?

Built-in Features: Ktor has built-in features such as routing, serialization, and HTTP handling, which make it easier for developers to build web applications. Netty, on the other hand, provides a lower-level network application framework and does not come with built-in features like routing and serialization.
Concurrency: Ktor uses Kotlin's coroutines to provide a powerful and efficient way of writing asynchronous code. This makes it easier for developers to handle concurrency and write scalable applications. Netty also supports asynchronous programming, but it uses a different approach with its own concurrency model.
Modularity: Ktor is designed to be highly modular, allowing developers to easily add or remove modules based on their requirements. This makes it flexible and allows for better code organization. Netty, on the other hand, provides a more monolithic framework with fewer options for customization and modularity.
Ease of Use: Ktor provides a simple and intuitive API that is easy to learn and use. It leverages Kotlin's language features and provides a DSL-like syntax for defining routes and handling requests. Netty, on the other hand, has a more complex API and requires more boilerplate code to achieve the same functionality.
Performance: Ktor is built on top of Netty and leverages its high-performance networking capabilities. However, Netty is a more low-level framework and provides finer-grained control over the networking layer, which can result in higher performance in certain use cases.
Community and Ecosystem: Ktor is a relatively new framework and has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Netty, which has been around for a longer time and has a larger and more mature community. This means that there are more resources, libraries, and tools available for Netty.

Ktor vs Netty

Overview