Ktor vs Simplify.Web

Overview

Simplify.Web

Stacks1

Followers3

Votes8

GitHub Stars24

Forks10

Ktor

Stacks173

Followers339

Votes27

GitHub Stars14.1K

Forks1.2K

Ktor vs Simplify.Web: What are the differences?

Introduction

Ktor and Simplify.Web are both web frameworks that can be used to build web applications. However, they have some key differences that set them apart.

Routing: The way routing is handled differs between Ktor and Simplify.Web. Ktor has a more flexible routing system that allows for complex routing scenarios with support for nested routes, path parameters, and route composition. On the other hand, Simplify.Web has a simpler routing system that is based on attributes and conventions, making it easier to understand and use for simple routing needs.
Performance: When it comes to performance, Ktor is designed to be highly efficient and scalable. It achieves this through the use of coroutines and non-blocking I/O, which allows it to handle a large number of concurrent requests with low latency. Simplify.Web, while performant, may not have the same level of scalability and efficiency as Ktor due to its different architectural choices.
Integration: Ktor provides seamless integration with other Kotlin frameworks and libraries, such as kotlinx.coroutines for efficient asynchronous programming and serialization libraries like kotlinx.serialization. Simplify.Web, on the other hand, may not have the same level of integration with external Kotlin libraries since it follows a more minimalistic approach.
Flexibility: Ktor allows developers to have more control and flexibility over their web application's architecture and components. It provides a modular structure that allows for easy plugin integration and customization. Simplify.Web, on the other hand, follows a convention-over-configuration approach, which means that it provides a predefined set of conventions and defaults, limiting the flexibility and customization options compared to Ktor.
Community and Documentation: Ktor has a larger and more active community compared to Simplify.Web, which means that it has more resources, documentation, and support available. This can be beneficial for developers who are new to web development or need help with troubleshooting and finding solutions to common problems.
Maturity and Stability: Ktor has been around for a longer time and is considered to be more mature and stable compared to Simplify.Web. Its longer history means that it has been tested and used in production by a larger number of users, leading to a more stable and battle-tested framework.

In summary, Ktor offers a more flexible routing system, better performance, extensive integration options, increased flexibility, a larger community, and is more mature and stable compared to Simplify.Web.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Simplify.Web	Ktor
It is a lightweight and fast server-side .NET web-framework based on MVC and OWIN for building HTTP based web-applications, RESTful APIs etc.	It is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language.
Comes as Microsoft.AspNetCore OWIN middleware; Can be used as an API backend only with front-end frameworks; Based on MVC and MVVM patterns; Lightweight & Fast; Uses switchable IOC container for itself and controllers, views constructor injection (Simplify.DI); Support async controllers; Supports controllers which can be run on any request; Localization-friendly (supports templates, strings and data files localization by default); Uses fast templates engine (Simplify.Templates); Mocking-friendly; Mono-friendly	Unopinionated;Asynchronous;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24	GitHub Stars 14.1K
GitHub Forks 10	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 1	Stacks 173
Followers 3	Followers 339
Votes 8	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Supports localization out of the box 1 Documentation available 1 C# 1 .NET 1 Easy to use	Pros 9 Simple & Small 8 Kotlin native 7 Light weight 3 High performance Cons 2 Relatively fresh technology - not a lot of expertise 2 Not self-explanatory: relies on Kotlin "magic"
Integrations
.NET Microsoft IIS	Linux Windows IntelliJ IDEA Kotlin macOS

What are some alternatives to Simplify.Web, Ktor?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Ktor vs Simplify.Web: What are the differences?

Introduction

Ktor and Simplify.Web are both web frameworks that can be used to build web applications. However, they have some key differences that set them apart.

Routing: The way routing is handled differs between Ktor and Simplify.Web. Ktor has a more flexible routing system that allows for complex routing scenarios with support for nested routes, path parameters, and route composition. On the other hand, Simplify.Web has a simpler routing system that is based on attributes and conventions, making it easier to understand and use for simple routing needs.
Performance: When it comes to performance, Ktor is designed to be highly efficient and scalable. It achieves this through the use of coroutines and non-blocking I/O, which allows it to handle a large number of concurrent requests with low latency. Simplify.Web, while performant, may not have the same level of scalability and efficiency as Ktor due to its different architectural choices.
Integration: Ktor provides seamless integration with other Kotlin frameworks and libraries, such as kotlinx.coroutines for efficient asynchronous programming and serialization libraries like kotlinx.serialization. Simplify.Web, on the other hand, may not have the same level of integration with external Kotlin libraries since it follows a more minimalistic approach.
Flexibility: Ktor allows developers to have more control and flexibility over their web application's architecture and components. It provides a modular structure that allows for easy plugin integration and customization. Simplify.Web, on the other hand, follows a convention-over-configuration approach, which means that it provides a predefined set of conventions and defaults, limiting the flexibility and customization options compared to Ktor.
Community and Documentation: Ktor has a larger and more active community compared to Simplify.Web, which means that it has more resources, documentation, and support available. This can be beneficial for developers who are new to web development or need help with troubleshooting and finding solutions to common problems.
Maturity and Stability: Ktor has been around for a longer time and is considered to be more mature and stable compared to Simplify.Web. Its longer history means that it has been tested and used in production by a larger number of users, leading to a more stable and battle-tested framework.

Ktor vs Simplify.Web

Overview