StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. KubeVirt vs Otto

KubeVirt vs Otto

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Otto
Otto
Stacks27
Followers86
Votes18
GitHub Stars4.2K
Forks214
KubeVirt
KubeVirt
Stacks5
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks1.5K

Otto vs KubeVirt: What are the differences?

Developers describe Otto as "Development and Deployment Made Easy. The successor to Vagrant". Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application. On the other hand, KubeVirt is detailed as "Virtual Machine Management on Kubernetes". It addresses the needs of development teams that have adopted or want to adopt Kubernetes but possess existing Virtual Machine-based workloads that cannot be easily containerized. More specifically, the technology provides a unified development platform where developers can build, modify, and deploy applications residing in both Application Containers as well as Virtual Machines in a common, shared environment.

Otto and KubeVirt can be primarily classified as "Virtual Machine Management" tools.

Otto and KubeVirt are both open source tools. It seems that Otto with 4.37K GitHub stars and 246 forks on GitHub has more adoption than KubeVirt with 1.86K GitHub stars and 422 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Otto
Otto
KubeVirt
KubeVirt

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

It addresses the needs of development teams that have adopted or want to adopt Kubernetes but possess existing Virtual Machine-based workloads that cannot be easily containerized. More specifically, the technology provides a unified development platform where developers can build, modify, and deploy applications residing in both Application Containers as well as Virtual Machines in a common, shared environment.

-
Open Source; Kubernetes Compatible; Windows and Linux VMs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.2K
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Forks
214
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
27
Stacks
5
Followers
86
Followers
19
Votes
18
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Vagrant-like
  • 4
    Written in golang
  • 3
    Hashicorp built
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Consul
Consul
Terraform
Terraform
Vagrant
Vagrant
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Otto, KubeVirt?

Vagrant

Vagrant

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

Azk

Azk

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

XenServer

XenServer

It is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.

VMware ESXi

VMware ESXi

It is a bare metal hypervisor that installs easily on to your server and partitions it into multiple virtual machines. It effectively partitions hardware to consolidate applications and cut costs.

Xen Orchestra

Xen Orchestra

It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs.

PuPHPet

PuPHPet

It is a web application that allows you to easily and quickly generate custom Vagrant and Puppet controlled virtual machines.

Azure Arc

Azure Arc

It offers simplified management, faster app development, and consistent Azure services. Easily organize, govern, and secure Windows, Linux, SQL Server, and Kubernetes clusters across data centers, the edge, and multi-cloud environments right from Azure. Architect, design, and build cloud-native apps anywhere without sacrificing central visibility and control. Get Azure innovation and cloud benefits by deploying consistent Azure data, application, and machine learning services on any infrastructure.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana