Laravel vs Masonite

Overview

Laravel

Stacks28.7K

Followers23.7K

Votes3.9K

GitHub Stars82.6K

Forks24.6K

Masonite

Stacks13

Followers27

Votes6

GitHub Stars2.3K

Forks133

Laravel vs Masonite: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Laravel and Masonite

Architecture: Laravel follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural pattern, providing a structured way to build applications. On the other hand, Masonite follows the HMVC (Hierarchical Model-View-Controller) pattern, which allows for more modular and reusable components by nesting MVC modules within each other.
Community Support: Laravel has a larger and more active community compared to Masonite. This results in a wider range of resources, tutorials, plugins, and community-driven solutions available for Laravel developers. Masonite, being relatively newer, is still growing its community.
Learning Curve: Laravel is known for its ease of learning and beginner-friendly documentation, making it accessible to developers of all levels. On the contrary, Masonite offers a more streamlined and flexible approach, which might require some familiarity with advanced concepts for developers to fully utilize its features.
Built-in Features: Laravel comes with a rich set of built-in features, such as authentication, queues, and caching, allowing developers to quickly set up common functionalities in their applications. Masonite, though it provides a minimalist core architecture, encourages developers to build features as needed, leading to more customized solutions but requiring additional setup.
Testing Support: Laravel has a robust testing environment with PHPUnit support and convenient testing facilities for unit, feature, and integration testing. Masonite also supports testing but might not offer as many built-in options or conveniences as Laravel, potentially requiring more effort in setting up testing environments.
Performance Optimization: Laravel includes tools like Eloquent ORM and Blade templating engine, while Masonite focuses on performance optimizations through features like dynamic dependency injection and middleware execution, catering to developers who prioritize speed and efficiency in their applications.

In Summary, Laravel and Masonite differ in architecture, community support, learning curve, built-in features, testing support, and performance optimization, providing developers with distinct choices based on their project requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Laravel, Masonite

John

Jun 28, 2019

Reviewon

Laravel

I use Laravel because it has integrated unit testing that making TDD a breeze. Having a View (Blade engine) making me easier to work without too many efforts in front-end.

I do recommend going into the root of programming once getting stable on any framework. Go beyond Symfony, go beyond PHP, go into the roots to the mother of programming; c++, c, smalltalk, erlang OTP. Understand the fundamental principle of abstraction.

A framework is just a framework, it helps in getting feedback quickly; like practicing dancing in front of a mirror. Getting fundamentals right is the one true key in doing it right. Programming is not hard, but abstract-programming is extremely hard.

3.81k views3.81k

Comments

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel	Masonite
It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.	A web framework that is extremely simple and changes what it means for a batteries included Python framework. Intuitive and elegant from installation to deployment.
Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing	Easily send emails with the Mail Provider and the SMTP and Mailgun drivers.;Send websocket requests from your server with the Broadcast Provider and Pusher and Ably drivers.;IOC container and auto resolving dependency injection.;Service Providers to easily add functionality to the framework.;Extremely simple static files configured and ready to go.;Active Record style ORM called Orator.;An extremely useful command line tool called craft commands.;Extremely extendable.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 82.6K	GitHub Stars 2.3K
GitHub Forks 24.6K	GitHub Forks 133
Stacks 28.7K	Stacks 13
Followers 23.7K	Followers 27
Votes 3.9K	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 555 Clean architecture 392 Growing community 370 Composer friendly 344 Open source 325 The only framework to consider for php Cons 54 PHP 33 Too many dependency 23 Slower than the other two 17 A lot of static method calls for convenience 15 Too many include	Pros 4 The Easiest python Framework TO Work With 1 Clear documentation 1 Easy to transition from Laravel
Integrations
PHP Django CodeIgniter CakePHP	Python GitHub PHP

What are some alternatives to Laravel, Masonite?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Laravel vs Masonite: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Laravel and Masonite

Architecture: Laravel follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural pattern, providing a structured way to build applications. On the other hand, Masonite follows the HMVC (Hierarchical Model-View-Controller) pattern, which allows for more modular and reusable components by nesting MVC modules within each other.
Community Support: Laravel has a larger and more active community compared to Masonite. This results in a wider range of resources, tutorials, plugins, and community-driven solutions available for Laravel developers. Masonite, being relatively newer, is still growing its community.
Learning Curve: Laravel is known for its ease of learning and beginner-friendly documentation, making it accessible to developers of all levels. On the contrary, Masonite offers a more streamlined and flexible approach, which might require some familiarity with advanced concepts for developers to fully utilize its features.
Built-in Features: Laravel comes with a rich set of built-in features, such as authentication, queues, and caching, allowing developers to quickly set up common functionalities in their applications. Masonite, though it provides a minimalist core architecture, encourages developers to build features as needed, leading to more customized solutions but requiring additional setup.
Testing Support: Laravel has a robust testing environment with PHPUnit support and convenient testing facilities for unit, feature, and integration testing. Masonite also supports testing but might not offer as many built-in options or conveniences as Laravel, potentially requiring more effort in setting up testing environments.
Performance Optimization: Laravel includes tools like Eloquent ORM and Blade templating engine, while Masonite focuses on performance optimizations through features like dynamic dependency injection and middleware execution, catering to developers who prioritize speed and efficiency in their applications.

Laravel vs Masonite

Overview

Laravel vs Masonite: What are the differences?