Laravel vs Mono

Overview

Laravel

Stacks28.7K

Followers23.7K

Votes3.9K

GitHub Stars82.6K

Forks24.6K

Mono

Stacks94

Followers59

Votes1

GitHub Stars11.4K

Forks3.8K

Laravel vs Mono: What are the differences?

Architecture: Laravel follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural pattern, providing a structured way to build web applications, while Mono uses a simpler architecture with less overhead, making it suitable for smaller projects or simpler applications.
Features: Laravel offers a wide range of built-in features such as ORM, templating engine, authentication, and testing tools, whereas Mono focuses on a more minimalist approach, providing essential functionalities for basic web development needs.
Community Support: Laravel has a large and active community that regularly contributes to its development, provides plugins, and offers support, whereas Mono has a smaller community and may have limited resources for troubleshooting or additional features.
Learning Curve: Laravel can have a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive features and complex architecture, while Mono is designed to be more beginner-friendly and easier to grasp for new developers.
Performance: Laravel may require more resources and overhead due to its extensive features and architectural complexity, which can affect performance compared to the lightweight nature of Mono, which is more optimized for speed and efficiency.
Scalability: Laravel is well-suited for complex, scalable applications that may require extensive customization and features, whereas Mono is better suited for smaller projects or applications that do not require the same level of scalability or customization.

In Summary, Laravel and Mono differ in terms of architecture, features, community support, learning curve, performance, and scalability, making each suitable for different types of web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Laravel, Mono

John

Jun 28, 2019

Reviewon

Laravel

I use Laravel because it has integrated unit testing that making TDD a breeze. Having a View (Blade engine) making me easier to work without too many efforts in front-end.

I do recommend going into the root of programming once getting stable on any framework. Go beyond Symfony, go beyond PHP, go into the roots to the mother of programming; c++, c, smalltalk, erlang OTP. Understand the fundamental principle of abstraction.

A framework is just a framework, it helps in getting feedback quickly; like practicing dancing in front of a mirror. Getting fundamentals right is the one true key in doing it right. Programming is not hard, but abstract-programming is extremely hard.

3.81k views3.81k

Comments

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel	Mono
It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.	It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.
Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing	Cross platform ;Open source; Implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars 82.6K	GitHub Stars 11.4K
GitHub Forks 24.6K	GitHub Forks 3.8K
Stacks 28.7K	Stacks 94
Followers 23.7K	Followers 59
Votes 3.9K	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 555 Clean architecture 392 Growing community 370 Composer friendly 344 Open source 325 The only framework to consider for php Cons 54 PHP 33 Too many dependency 23 Slower than the other two 17 A lot of static method calls for convenience 15 Too many include	Pros 1 It was great, pre-dotnetcore
Integrations
PHP Django CodeIgniter CakePHP	Entity Framework Mac OS X C# Windows Debian

What are some alternatives to Laravel, Mono?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Laravel vs Mono: What are the differences?

Architecture: Laravel follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural pattern, providing a structured way to build web applications, while Mono uses a simpler architecture with less overhead, making it suitable for smaller projects or simpler applications.
Features: Laravel offers a wide range of built-in features such as ORM, templating engine, authentication, and testing tools, whereas Mono focuses on a more minimalist approach, providing essential functionalities for basic web development needs.
Community Support: Laravel has a large and active community that regularly contributes to its development, provides plugins, and offers support, whereas Mono has a smaller community and may have limited resources for troubleshooting or additional features.
Learning Curve: Laravel can have a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive features and complex architecture, while Mono is designed to be more beginner-friendly and easier to grasp for new developers.
Performance: Laravel may require more resources and overhead due to its extensive features and architectural complexity, which can affect performance compared to the lightweight nature of Mono, which is more optimized for speed and efficiency.
Scalability: Laravel is well-suited for complex, scalable applications that may require extensive customization and features, whereas Mono is better suited for smaller projects or applications that do not require the same level of scalability or customization.

Laravel vs Mono

Overview