StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Laravel vs ThinkPhp

Laravel vs ThinkPhp

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.7K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K
ThinkPhp
ThinkPhp
Stacks41
Followers25
Votes0

Laravel vs ThinkPhp: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here we will discuss the key differences between Laravel and ThinkPhp, two popular PHP frameworks.

  1. Architecture: Laravel follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern, whereas ThinkPhp follows the Hierarchical Model-View-Controller (HMVC) architectural pattern. This means that Laravel separates the application's logic into model, view, and controller components, while ThinkPhp allows for nested MVC modules, providing more flexibility for large-scale applications.

  2. Community Support: Laravel has a larger and more active community compared to ThinkPhp. This means that Laravel has more online resources, tutorials, and community support available, making it easier for developers to find help and solutions to problems. ThinkPhp, on the other hand, may have fewer resources and a smaller community.

  3. Learning Curve: Laravel is known for its elegant and intuitive syntax, making it easier for developers to learn and use. It provides a more straightforward and consistent coding experience, which is beneficial for beginners or those with less experience in PHP development. ThinkPhp, although still user-friendly, may have a slightly steeper learning curve due to its more extensive list of features and configuration options.

  4. Database Access: Laravel's built-in ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) called Eloquent allows developers to interact with databases using PHP code instead of writing raw SQL queries. This simplifies database access and makes the code more maintainable. ThinkPhp also has its own ORM called TinkORM, but it may not be as feature-rich or widely used as Laravel's Eloquent.

  5. Routing: Laravel provides a powerful and flexible routing system that allows developers to define routes with custom URL patterns and handle request/response logic easily. ThinkPhp also has a routing system but may not have the same level of flexibility and customization options as Laravel.

  6. Templating Engine: Laravel uses its own templating engine called Blade, which provides features like template inheritance, conditional statements, loops, and more. ThinkPhp, on the other hand, uses a simpler templating engine that may not have all the advanced features offered by Blade. This can affect the ease and flexibility of handling views in the two frameworks.

In summary, Laravel and ThinkPhp have differences in terms of architecture, community support, learning curve, database access, routing, and templating engine. Laravel follows the MVC pattern, has a larger community, and offers an intuitive syntax. It also provides a powerful routing system and a feature-rich ORM. ThinkPhp, on the other hand, follows the HMVC pattern, may have a smaller community, and has a slightly steeper learning curve. It has its own ORM and routing system but may not offer as many advanced features as Laravel in certain areas.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Laravel, ThinkPhp

John
John

Jun 28, 2019

ReviewonLaravelLaravel

I use Laravel because it has integrated unit testing that making TDD a breeze. Having a View (Blade engine) making me easier to work without too many efforts in front-end.

I do recommend going into the root of programming once getting stable on any framework. Go beyond Symfony, go beyond PHP, go into the roots to the mother of programming; c++, c, smalltalk, erlang OTP. Understand the fundamental principle of abstraction.

A framework is just a framework, it helps in getting feedback quickly; like practicing dancing in front of a mirror. Getting fundamentals right is the one true key in doing it right. Programming is not hard, but abstract-programming is extremely hard.

3.81k views3.81k
Comments
Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
washie
washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel
Laravel
ThinkPhp
ThinkPhp

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

It focuses on rapid development of enterprise projects and is very popular in China where over 40,000 servers run it

Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
Quick; Simple; Object-oriented
Statistics
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
28.7K
Stacks
41
Followers
23.7K
Followers
25
Votes
3.9K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 555
    Clean architecture
  • 392
    Growing community
  • 370
    Composer friendly
  • 344
    Open source
  • 325
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP
GitHub
GitHub
PHP
PHP
CakePHP
CakePHP

What are some alternatives to Laravel, ThinkPhp?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase