StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Laravel vs Typo3

Laravel vs Typo3

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.8K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K
Typo3
Typo3
Stacks130
Followers86
Votes50

Laravel vs Typo3: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Laravel and Typo3. Both Laravel and Typo3 are popular web development frameworks, but there are distinct differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture and Purpose: Laravel is a PHP web application framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern. It focuses on simplicity and elegance, making it ideal for building small to medium-sized applications. On the other hand, Typo3 is a Content Management System (CMS) that is built using PHP and follows a modular architecture. It is designed specifically for building complex and scalable websites.

  2. Community and Ecosystem: Laravel has a large and vibrant community of developers, which has resulted in a rich ecosystem of third-party packages and extensions. It has an active online community, with regular updates and contributions. Typo3 also has a dedicated community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Laravel. However, Typo3 offers a wide range of extensions and plugins that enhance its functionality as a CMS.

  3. Learning Curve: Laravel has a relatively gentle learning curve, thanks to its extensive documentation and beginner-friendly features. It provides a straightforward development experience with built-in features like routing, templating, and database management. On the other hand, Typo3 has a steeper learning curve, mainly due to its modular architecture and advanced features. It requires a deeper understanding of its concepts and configuration.

  4. Flexibility and Customization: Laravel offers a high level of flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to adapt the framework to fit their specific needs. It provides a well-structured and modular codebase, making it easy to extend and modify. Typo3, being a CMS, provides a structured environment for managing content, but its customization options are more focused on modifying the front-end design and layout rather than the core functionality.

  5. Development Speed: Laravel promotes rapid development with its elegant syntax, extensive documentation, and built-in features. It provides a wide range of tools and libraries that speed up the development process. Typo3, being a CMS, offers a more structured and predefined environment for content management, which may result in a slightly slower development pace compared to Laravel.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Laravel is known for its scalability and performance optimization features. It provides caching mechanisms, queuing systems, and database optimization tools to improve the overall performance of applications. Typo3, being a CMS, can handle larger and complex websites with ease. It provides built-in caching and indexing mechanisms to optimize performance, but it may not be as performant as Laravel for smaller and less complex projects.

In summary, Laravel is a versatile PHP framework focused on simplicity and rapid development, while Typo3 is a powerful CMS designed for managing complex websites. Laravel offers more flexibility and a larger ecosystem, but Typo3 provides a structured environment specifically tailored for content management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Laravel, Typo3

John
John

Jun 28, 2019

ReviewonLaravelLaravel

I use Laravel because it has integrated unit testing that making TDD a breeze. Having a View (Blade engine) making me easier to work without too many efforts in front-end.

I do recommend going into the root of programming once getting stable on any framework. Go beyond Symfony, go beyond PHP, go into the roots to the mother of programming; c++, c, smalltalk, erlang OTP. Understand the fundamental principle of abstraction.

A framework is just a framework, it helps in getting feedback quickly; like practicing dancing in front of a mirror. Getting fundamentals right is the one true key in doing it right. Programming is not hard, but abstract-programming is extremely hard.

3.83k views3.83k
Comments
Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
washie
washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel
Laravel
Typo3
Typo3

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
28.7K
Stacks
130
Followers
23.8K
Followers
86
Votes
3.9K
Votes
50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 556
    Clean architecture
  • 393
    Growing community
  • 371
    Composer friendly
  • 345
    Open source
  • 326
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
Pros
  • 7
    Great Security
  • 6
    Enterprise CMS
  • 5
    LTS and ELTS
  • 5
    Open source
  • 4
    Customizable
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Laravel, Typo3?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase