StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Laravel vs Web Starter Kit

Laravel vs Web Starter Kit

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Web Starter Kit
Web Starter Kit
Stacks176
Followers207
Votes3
GitHub Stars18.4K
Forks3.0K
Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.8K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K

Laravel vs Web Starter Kit: What are the differences?

Introduction

Laravel and Web Starter Kit are both popular web development frameworks used for building websites. However, they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Ease of Use: Laravel is renowned for its simplicity and user-friendly design, making it easy for developers of all levels to work with. It provides a clear and intuitive syntax, reducing the learning curve. On the other hand, Web Starter Kit requires a deeper understanding of web development concepts and may be more suitable for experienced developers.

  2. Development Speed: Laravel offers a wide range of built-in features and libraries that allow developers to rapidly build web applications. It includes features like an ORM, authentication system, routing, and caching, which can significantly speed up development. Web Starter Kit, on the other hand, does not provide as many pre-packaged features, requiring more manual configuration and potentially slowing down development time.

  3. Community Support: Laravel has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its growth. This means that there are numerous online resources, tutorials, forums, and packages readily available to assist developers with any issues they may encounter while working with Laravel. Web Starter Kit, while still having support, may not have as vast a community as Laravel.

  4. Flexibility: Laravel follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural pattern, which promotes code separation and modular development. This allows for more flexibility in designing and organizing the application's codebase. Web Starter Kit, however, does not enforce a specific architectural pattern and allows developers to choose their preferred structure, which can be both an advantage and a disadvantage depending on the project requirements and developer preferences.

  5. Backend Integration: Laravel has built-in support for working with databases, including migration tools that facilitate database schema management. It also integrates seamlessly with popular databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL. Web Starter Kit, on the other hand, does not have built-in database integration and requires additional configuration and setup for database interactions.

  6. Frontend Development: In terms of frontend development, Laravel offers Blade, a templating engine that provides a simple and elegant syntax for generating HTML. It also supports popular frontend frameworks like Vue.js and React, allowing seamless integration and development of rich user interfaces. Web Starter Kit, however, primarily focuses on the frontend and provides modern tools like Sass, Autoprefixer, and asset optimization for improved performance and maintainability.

In summary, Laravel is known for its user-friendly design, rapid development capabilities, extensive community support, code flexibility, backend integration features, and templating engine, while Web Starter Kit is more focused on frontend development, providing modern frontend tools and optimization techniques.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Web Starter Kit, Laravel

Ahmet
Ahmet

Full Stack Developer

Jun 28, 2019

ReviewonLaravelLaravel

I use Laravel because right now it's really hard to find someone using native PHP without a framework. Also learning a framework easier than native for newcomers. Also; I was not supporting frameworks before but after start developing a core with one I saw i can find many new people for the projects.

1.08k views1.08k
Comments
Tanner
Tanner

owner, designer, developer at Coyote6 GraphX

Jun 28, 2019

ReviewonLaravelLaravel

If you are going to build from scratch use Laravel, because it is a little easier to learn than Symfony. They have a bunch of great videos to help you along the way. If you know Drupal 8 already, that is built on Symfony and you can harness the backend, but it is going to have a steeper learning curve. On the plus side you can take advantage of all its features. I wouldn't recommend building without a type of framework. Thousands of man hours have gone into those things for a reason. I started learning Symfony w/o Drupal but lost interest once I found out how much easier Laravel was. They both have their advantages and disadvantages, laravel actually uses part of symfony in its code. I like the blade template system better than twig is a big factor in deciding as well. They are both very similar, but blade is closer to native PHP which makes it a little easier to learn.

480 views480
Comments
Jigar
Jigar

Senior Application Developer at Endurance International Group

Jun 29, 2019

ReviewonLaravelLaravel

I use Laravel because you don't have to re-invent the wheel when compared to core PHP. We can focus directly on business logic. And the little learning curve for Laravel is worth it. Can't really compare with Laravel with Symfony as I haven't worked with Symfony yet. My suggestion would be to pick one and stick to it. If at all you have to move to other, it should be easy. Last thing I would like to add is that there are more people around who knows Laravel compared to PHP, may be that's why I started with Laravel.

370 views370
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Web Starter Kit
Web Starter Kit
Laravel
Laravel

Web Starter Kit is a starting point for multi-screen web development. It encompasses opinionated recommendations on boilerplate and tooling for building an experience that works great across multiple devices. We help you stay productive and aligned with the best practices outlined in Google's Web Fundamentals.

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Multi-device responsive boilerplate;Living component style guide;Cross-device Synchronization;Live Browser Reloading;Performance optimization;Built in HTTP Server;PageSpeed Insights Reporting;Sass support
Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.4K
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
24.6K
Stacks
176
Stacks
28.7K
Followers
207
Followers
23.8K
Votes
3
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
Pros
  • 556
    Clean architecture
  • 393
    Growing community
  • 371
    Composer friendly
  • 345
    Open source
  • 326
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
Integrations
gulp
gulp
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP

What are some alternatives to Web Starter Kit, Laravel?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase