LibreNMS vs Packetbeat: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When comparing LibreNMS and Packetbeat, it is important to understand the key differences between these two network monitoring tools.

## 1. Scalability:
LibreNMS is better suited for larger networks as it can handle a higher volume of devices and interfaces compared to Packetbeat.

## 2. Protocol Support:
Packetbeat specializes in monitoring network traffic at the packet level, providing detailed insights into protocols such as HTTP, MySQL, and Redis, whereas LibreNMS offers SNMP-based monitoring for network devices.

## 3. Customization:
LibreNMS allows for extensive customization through plugins and extensions, offering a high level of flexibility in monitoring various network parameters. On the other hand, Packetbeat is more focused on providing predefined monitoring capabilities without extensive customization options.

## 4. Real-time Monitoring:
Packetbeat excels in real-time monitoring, providing immediate visibility into network performance and activity, while LibreNMS may have slight delays in data collection and analysis.

## 5. Alerting Functionality:
LibreNMS features comprehensive alerting functionality, allowing users to set up alerts based on specific thresholds and conditions, whereas Packetbeat primarily focuses on monitoring and may require additional tools for extensive alerting capabilities.

## 6. Ease of Deployment:
Packetbeat is known for its lightweight and easy deployment, making it suitable for quick setup and monitoring needs, while LibreNMS may require more configuration and setup time due to its extensive feature set and capabilities.

In Summary, LibreNMS and Packetbeat differ in scalability, protocol support, customization, real-time monitoring, alerting functionality, and ease of deployment.