LibreNMS vs Riemann

Overview

Riemann

Stacks41

Followers55

Votes9

LibreNMS

Stacks55

Followers186

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks2.5K

LibreNMS vs Riemann: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing LibreNMS and Riemann, there are several key differences that separate the two monitoring systems.

Data Storage: LibreNMS uses a MySQL database to store monitoring data, while Riemann utilizes an in-memory storage system which allows for real-time data processing and analysis without the need for persistent storage.
Alerting System: LibreNMS provides a robust alerting system that allows users to set up customizable alerts based on specific criteria, whereas Riemann focuses on event processing and does not offer the same level of alerting functionality out of the box.
Monitoring Scope: LibreNMS is primarily focused on network monitoring and management, providing comprehensive visibility into network infrastructure, while Riemann is designed for monitoring and analyzing distributed systems and applications.
Scalability: Riemann is known for its scalability and high performance in processing large amounts of data streams in real-time, making it suitable for monitoring complex and dynamic environments, whereas LibreNMS may face limitations with scalability in larger deployments.
Ease of Configuration: LibreNMS is known for its user-friendly interface and easy setup process, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise, while Riemann requires a deeper understanding of its configuration language and concepts to properly implement and customize monitoring tasks.
Community Support: LibreNMS has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing a wealth of resources and support for troubleshooting and expanding the platform, whereas Riemann has a smaller but dedicated community focused on its specific use cases and functionalities.

In Summary, LibreNMS and Riemann differ in terms of data storage, alerting system, monitoring scope, scalability, ease of configuration, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Riemann	LibreNMS
Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.	It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.
See your system at a glance with a Sinatra app; Throttle or roll up multiple events into a single message; Forward any event stream to Graphite; Query states easily	Monitoring; Alerting; Distributed monitoring; Open-source; Automatic discovery; API; Billing system; Automatic updates
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.5K
Stacks 41	Stacks 55
Followers 55	Followers 186
Votes 9	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Sophisticated stream processing DSL 4 Clojure-based stream processing	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Datadog Kong EasyEngine Plesk Server Density OpenResty OpsDash Scalyr

What are some alternatives to Riemann, LibreNMS?

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

Wireshark

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Pi-hole

It is a DNS sinkhole that protects your devices from unwanted content, without installing any client-side software. You can run it in a container, or deploy it directly to a supported operating system via our automated installer.

Cisco ISE

A critical component of any zero-trust strategy is securing the environment that everyone and everything is connecting to: the workplace. It enables a dynamic and automated approach to policy enforcement that empowers software-defined access and automated network segmentation within IT and OT environments.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

LibreNMS vs Riemann: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing LibreNMS and Riemann, there are several key differences that separate the two monitoring systems.

Data Storage: LibreNMS uses a MySQL database to store monitoring data, while Riemann utilizes an in-memory storage system which allows for real-time data processing and analysis without the need for persistent storage.
Alerting System: LibreNMS provides a robust alerting system that allows users to set up customizable alerts based on specific criteria, whereas Riemann focuses on event processing and does not offer the same level of alerting functionality out of the box.
Monitoring Scope: LibreNMS is primarily focused on network monitoring and management, providing comprehensive visibility into network infrastructure, while Riemann is designed for monitoring and analyzing distributed systems and applications.
Scalability: Riemann is known for its scalability and high performance in processing large amounts of data streams in real-time, making it suitable for monitoring complex and dynamic environments, whereas LibreNMS may face limitations with scalability in larger deployments.
Ease of Configuration: LibreNMS is known for its user-friendly interface and easy setup process, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise, while Riemann requires a deeper understanding of its configuration language and concepts to properly implement and customize monitoring tasks.
Community Support: LibreNMS has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing a wealth of resources and support for troubleshooting and expanding the platform, whereas Riemann has a smaller but dedicated community focused on its specific use cases and functionalities.

In Summary, LibreNMS and Riemann differ in terms of data storage, alerting system, monitoring scope, scalability, ease of configuration, and community support.