Linaria vs styled-components

Overview

styled-components

Stacks2.6K

Followers608

Votes12

GitHub Stars41.0K

Forks2.5K

Linaria

Stacks10

Followers16

Votes0

GitHub Stars12.2K

Forks417

Linaria vs styled-components: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Linaria and styled-components. Both of these libraries are used for styling in web development.

Runtime Performance: Linaria is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS library that extracts the styles during the build process, resulting in no overhead at runtime. On the other hand, styled-components injects the styles at runtime, which may impact the performance of the application.
CSS Scope: Linaria scopes the CSS styles to the component they are defined in. This means that the styles defined in one component do not leak into other components. In contrast, styled-components use a global namespace, allowing styles to be reused across components.
Vendor Prefixing: Linaria automatically adds vendor prefixes to the CSS properties that require them, ensuring cross-browser compatibility. However, styled-components does not handle vendor prefixing by default, and you need to manually handle it.
Build Time Optimization: Linaria optimizes the build process by extracting the CSS during build time, resulting in smaller bundle sizes and faster load times. On the other hand, styled-components do not provide built-in build time optimization, which may result in larger bundle sizes and slower load times.
Developer Experience: Linaria provides a better developer experience by allowing developers to write CSS-in-JS styles using familiar CSS syntax. It also provides easy integration with existing CSS frameworks. In contrast, styled-components have their own syntax for defining styles, which may require a learning curve for developers.
Styling Paradigm: Linaria follows a styled-components paradigm wherein the styles are defined within the component itself. This leads to better encapsulation and modularity. Styled-components, on the other hand, separates the styles from the components, making it easier to reuse styles across different components.

In summary, Linaria offers better runtime performance, CSS scope, vendor prefixing, build time optimization, developer experience, and follows a styled-components paradigm.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

styled-components	Linaria
Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅	Write CSS in JS and get real CSS files during build. Use dynamic prop based styles with the React bindings and have them transpiled to CSS variables automatically. Great productivity with source maps and linting support.
-	Write CSS in JS, but with zero runtime, CSS is extracted to CSS files during build; Familiar CSS syntax with Sass like nesting; Use dynamic prop based styles with the React bindings, uses CSS variables behind the scenes; Easily find where the style was defined with CSS sourcemaps; Lint your CSS in JS with stylelint; Use JavaScript for logic, no CSS preprocessor needed; Optionally use any CSS preprocessor such as Sass or PostCSS
Statistics
GitHub Stars 41.0K	GitHub Stars 12.2K
GitHub Forks 2.5K	GitHub Forks 417
Stacks 2.6K	Stacks 10
Followers 608	Followers 16
Votes 12	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Very easy to use and integrate 1 Huihui	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React	React JavaScript

What are some alternatives to styled-components, Linaria?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Linaria vs styled-components: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Linaria and styled-components. Both of these libraries are used for styling in web development.

Runtime Performance: Linaria is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS library that extracts the styles during the build process, resulting in no overhead at runtime. On the other hand, styled-components injects the styles at runtime, which may impact the performance of the application.
CSS Scope: Linaria scopes the CSS styles to the component they are defined in. This means that the styles defined in one component do not leak into other components. In contrast, styled-components use a global namespace, allowing styles to be reused across components.
Vendor Prefixing: Linaria automatically adds vendor prefixes to the CSS properties that require them, ensuring cross-browser compatibility. However, styled-components does not handle vendor prefixing by default, and you need to manually handle it.
Build Time Optimization: Linaria optimizes the build process by extracting the CSS during build time, resulting in smaller bundle sizes and faster load times. On the other hand, styled-components do not provide built-in build time optimization, which may result in larger bundle sizes and slower load times.
Developer Experience: Linaria provides a better developer experience by allowing developers to write CSS-in-JS styles using familiar CSS syntax. It also provides easy integration with existing CSS frameworks. In contrast, styled-components have their own syntax for defining styles, which may require a learning curve for developers.
Styling Paradigm: Linaria follows a styled-components paradigm wherein the styles are defined within the component itself. This leads to better encapsulation and modularity. Styled-components, on the other hand, separates the styles from the components, making it easier to reuse styles across different components.

In summary, Linaria offers better runtime performance, CSS scope, vendor prefixing, build time optimization, developer experience, and follows a styled-components paradigm.