LinDB vs RethinkDB: What are the differences?

# Comparison of LinDB and RethinkDB

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Data Model**: LinDB is a time series database designed specifically for time series data storage and querying, while RethinkDB is a document-oriented database that focuses on JSON-like document storage.
  
2. **Scalability**: LinDB is built to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle high volumes of time series data effectively, whereas RethinkDB has limitations in horizontal scalability due to its architecture.
  
3. **Query Language**: LinDB uses a SQL-like query language that is optimized for time series data querying, making it easier for users with SQL experience to work with the database. In contrast, RethinkDB uses a NoSQL query language that is designed for JSON documents.
  
4. **Consistency Model**: LinDB provides strong consistency guarantees by default, ensuring that all reads receive the most recent data, while RethinkDB offers eventual consistency to achieve high availability at the expense of strong consistency.
  
5. **High Availability**: LinDB offers automatic data replication and failover mechanisms for high availability, ensuring data durability and minimal downtime in the event of node failures. RethinkDB also supports replication but may require additional configuration for failover and high availability setups.
  
6. **Community Support**: LinDB is a newer project with a growing community and active development, providing regular updates and new features, while RethinkDB, though stable, has seen a decline in community activity since its early years.

In Summary, LinDB and RethinkDB differ in their data model, scalability, query language, consistency model, high availability features, and community support.